Navy Net - Royal Navy Community

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why Were The 9/11 Interrogation Tapes Destroyed?

Bergen

ADC
On December 5, the CIA's director, General Michael V. Hayden, issued a statement disclosing that in 2005 at least two videotapes of interrogations with al Qaeda prisoners were destroyed. The tapes, which the CIA did not provide to either the 9/11 Commission, nor to a federal court in the case of Zacarias Moussaoui, were destroyed, claimed Hayden, to protect the safety of undercover operatives.

Hayden did not disclose one of the al Qaeda suspects whose tapes were destroyed. But he did identify the other. It was Abu Zubaydah, the top ranking terror suspect when he was tracked and captured in Pakistan in 2003. In September 2006, at a press conference in which he defended American interrogation techniques, President Bush also mentioned Abu Zubaydah by name. Bush acknowledged that Zubaydah, who was wounded when captured, did not initially cooperate with his interrogators, but that eventually when he did talk, his information was, according to Bush, "quite important."

In my 2003 New York Times bestseller, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11, I discussed Abu Zubaydah at length in Chapter 19, "The Interrogation." There I set forth how Zubaydah initially refused to help his American captors. Also, disclosed was how U.S. intelligence established a so-called "fake flag" operation, in which the wounded Zubaydah was transferred to Afghanistan under the ruse that he had actually been turned over to the Saudis. The Saudis had him on a wanted list, and the Americans believed that Zubaydah, fearful of torture and death at the hands of the Saudis, would start talking when confronted by U.S. agents playing the role of Saudi intelligence officers.

Instead, when confronted by his "Saudi" interrogators, Zubaydah showed no fear. Instead, according to the two U.S. intelligence sources that provided me the details, he seemed relieved. The man who had been reluctant to even confirm his identity to his U.S. captors, suddenly talked animatedly. He was happy to see them, he said, because he feared the Americans would kill him. He then asked his interrogators to call a senior member of the Saudi royal family. And Zubaydah provided a private home number and a cell phone number from memory. "He will tell you what to do," Zubaydah assured them

That man was Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul-Aziz, one of King Fahd's nephews, and the chairman of the largest Saudi publishing empire. Later, American investigators would determine that Prince Ahmed had been in the U.S. on 9/11.

American interrogators used painkillers to induce Zubaydah to talk -- they gave him the meds when he cooperated, and withdrew them when he was quiet. They also utilized a thiopental sodium drip (a so-called truth serum). Several hours after he first fingered Prince Ahmed, his captors challenged the information, and said that since he had disparaged the Saudi royal family, he would be executed. It was at that point that some of the secrets of 9/11 came pouring out. In a short monologue, that one investigator told me was the "Rosetta Stone" of 9/11, Zubaydah laid out details of how he and the al Qaeda hierarchy had been supported at high levels inside the Saudi and Pakistan governments.

He named two other Saudi princes, and also the chief of Pakistan's air force, as his major contacts. Moreover, he stunned his interrogators, by charging that two of the men, the King's nephew, and the Pakistani Air Force chief, knew a major terror operation was planned for America on 9/11.

It would be nice to further investigate the men named by Zubaydah, but that is not possible. All four identified by Zubaydah are now dead. As for the three Saudi princes, the King's 43-year-old nephew, Prince Ahmed, died of either a heart attack or blood clot, depending on which report you believe, after having liposuction in Riyadh's top hospital; the second, 41-year-old Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki al-Saud, died the following day in a one car accident, on his way to the funeral of Prince Ahmed; and one week later, the third Saudi prince named by Zubaydah, 25-year-old Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir, died, according to the Saudi Royal Court, "of thirst." The head of Pakistan's Air Force, Mushaf Ali Mir, was the last to go. He died, together with his wife and fifteen of his top aides, when his plane blew up -- suspected as sabotage -- in February 2003. Pakistan's investigation of the explosion -- if one was even done -- has never been made public.

Zubaydah is the only top al Queda operative who has secretly linked two of America's closest allies in the war on terror -- Saudi Arabia and Pakistan -- to the 9/11 attacks. Why does Bush, and the CIA, continue to protect the Saudi Royal family and the Pakistani military, from the implications of Zubaydah's confessions? It is, or course, because the Bush administration desperately needs Pakistani and Saudi help, not only to keep Afghanistan from spinning completely out of control, but also as counterweights to the growing power of Iran. The Sunni governments in Riyadh and Islamabad have as much to fear from a resurgent Iran as does the Bush administration. But does this mean that leads about the origins of 9/11 should not be aggressively pursued? Of course not. But this is precisely what the Bush administration is doing. And now the cover-up is enhanced by the CIA's destruction of Zubaydah's interrogation tapes.
 

Oil_Slick

War Hero
Why did the US Administration allow 142 Saudi nationals including 24 members of the Bin Laden clan to fly out of the USA in the days after 9/11 without any hinderance…
 

AfterSSE

War Hero
What most of these intelligence briefings and expose's prove is the majority of Americans could care less about what is going on outside the confines of the continental US.

If ordinary Joe Q could connect the dots, and be insistent in his voicing of objections then the current or past administrations would be held accountable, and a lot of what goes on behind Whitehouse closed doors would be more transparent.

What was that movie? "Wag the Dogs Tail", everything now seems scripted like a B movie from Hollywood, even Tom Clancy couldn't write this stuff.

I have always harboured doubts about Pakistans "involvement or convenient alliance", or that of Saudi Arabia.

The fact that the CIA has never been completely overhauled and renamed speaks volumes, who is controlling the puppets strings? This agency has lost or had lost all credibility back in the Ollie North day's and Afghanistan, to think the current administration still takes their information as credible information is incredible...

And here you now have turmoil in Pakistan, which is probably making India nervous, if the Pakistani's can take control through Bhutto, then maybe then we will have the ally we should have, but I never trusted Musharref...too many inconcistancies....I mean how hard can it be to find OBL, someone should check the guest quarters in the Generals palace.... :afro:
 

lsadirty

War Hero
The CIA has been a law unto itself, since the days of Big George Bush and probably prior, and needs to be brought into a bit more of an accountable service. I watched a programme on SKY about UFOs, and the Head of the CIA announced "If the President needed to know about UFOs, we'd tell him". His name ? G W Bush Senior.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MoD_RSS Charity regulator issues Official Warning and Order against school where children were exposed to terrorist propaganda MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Press release: Report 02/2019: Self-detrainment of passengers onto lines that were still open to traffic and electrically live at Lewisham MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: "For the first time in a generation, elections were not dominated by the conflict, but defined by campaigns about issues affecting ordinary pe MoD News 0
D Those were the days History 13
P Gibraltar 1967 -were you there? The Quarterdeck 48
BillyNoMates When tabs were good for you. History 13
S Why were Skippers RNR equivalent to Warrant Officers? History 13
soleil Mail: 'RN Veteran Finally Receives His Medals, 64 Years After They Were Lost In Post' History 3
soleil Mail: "Were 30 Royal Marines Poisoned By Gas On Derelict Soviet Weapons Plant?" The Corps 5
W Hello .. my name Dick Chaytor and i am trying to find anyone who were class mates of Blogs 31
W People who were members of 120 MQC .Running from MAY 1969 to APRIL 1971 Blogs 0
soleil Mail: "Female RAF Recruits Get £100k ... Because They Were Made To March Like Men" Current Affairs 92
finknottle When We Were Very Young Diamond Lil's 83
pusser_uk Them were the days! The Quarterdeck 5
MoD_RSS News story: Honour for TA soldier who took command after officers were shot MoD News 0
SONAR-BENDER Roll up, roll up! See how steely eyed messengers of death were formed! History 5
2 Why were Middleton and Cottesmore built by yarrow ? The Quarterdeck 0
Drakey Oh, they were the days. Breakfast anyone? The Quarterdeck 16
Rumrat Stanly and Billy were lovers Diamond Lil's 13
stan_the_man Where were you Sept 11 2001?? Diamond Lil's 34
jesse What were the scandals and court cases involving singer David Whitfield. Films, Music, TV & All Things Artsy 15
stan_the_man The Hotel ITV Documentary - were have you been in the pusser Diamond Lil's 16
MG Maniac The Krankies were swingers! Diamond Lil's 6
S How mad/stupid at school were you? The Gash Barge 23
stan_the_man When schools were not PC Diamond Lil's 13
scouse Scouse Slim and Fred.were Skin and Pontius was just a twinkle in his Fathers eye The Fleet Air Arm 6
M sorry to post this but can't find the information any were Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 4
S Famous dates when ships were built History 8
rod-gearing If you were invisible... Diamond Lil's 12
L What would happen if you were to refuse a call out? RMR 6
2_deck_dash Serious debate: If you were the CDS how would you do it? The Quarterdeck 44
Merlin28 When I was young we were so poor.... The Gash Barge 82
Haggis_Catcher Watch were you dip your wick. Diamond Lil's 3
stan_the_man If all females were dead who would you shag Diamond Lil's 32
NotmeChief Where the 'F' were You Diamond Lil's 11
rod-gearing If Nelson were alive today Diamond Lil's 44
trelawney126 If Only All PTI's were This Good Diamond Lil's 0
soleil "Falklands would complain if HMS Endurance were withdrawn" The Fleet 0
bikerman "Betsy"Betton were is he now? The Quarterdeck 4
jumpinjarhead Marines' deaths were 'unlawful' Current Affairs 0
trelawney126 Shafted. And we thought they were on Holiday Current Affairs 3
S So where were you......... Diamond Lil's 63
NotmeChief By god they were brave. Diamond Lil's 2
N When, where and why were you disrated? Diamond Lil's 11
dublinclontarf Pirate problems and were puffting about Current Affairs 58
brazenhussy yes u were right!!!!!! Diamond Lil's 43
Niner_Domestic Where were you on July 11, 1982? History 24
B If i were on that jury.......... Current Affairs 27
golden_rivet if you were a septic who would you vote for ... Current Affairs 47
creddly Times you were dying to laugh but couldn't in the Royal Navy Diamond Lil's 54
Similar threads


















































Latest Threads

Top