Tories call for new nuclear subs

Discussion in 'Current Affairs' started by Agent_Smith, Mar 20, 2006.

Welcome to the Navy Net aka Rum Ration

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial RN website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. About time a politico had the balls to state the obvious! :D


    Beeb
     
  2. Do those turkeys think this is a vote winner?
     
  3. No, it's just that the tories are looking to force the hard decisions that labour are too pussy-whipped to make by themselves.

    Labour need to learn from Dr Fox's example! Making a strong argument over a policy that is unlikely to gain them any political points or voters. Can't say i've seen much evidence of that in government for the last 8yrs!
     
  4. So what are new A boats ? Chopped liver ?
     
  5. What evidence do you have to support your post or is it just a Tories opinion?
     
  6. janner

    janner War Hero Book Reviewer

    They are SSK not SSBN
     
  7. the new A boats are not chopped liver just hunter killers and do not have a ballistic missile capability.
     
  8. As a Polaris man 1971-74, I felt that I was doing one of the few worthwhile jobs in the RN. Things change, though, and now I'm going to say that the 'Nuclear Deterrent', in the shape of the ICBM, has become a white elephant. An incredibly expensive one, too, which ties up too much of the National Defence Budget, let alone the Navy's.

    The Astute SSN class, along with the S and T boats, can carry an effective 'in-theatre' deterrent right to the doorstep of any potential threat, but even then that's only doing something that could be carried out by a skimmer. Either way, with support from a Carrier Group, that's as much as the UK can do to 'punch its weight' and we'd still be contributing to allied power more effectively than we do today. Perhaps it's time to think again about the RAF dealing with any deeper inland targets.

    There, I've said it!
     
  9. Bravo G_W. Couldn't have put it better myself. 8)
     
  10. hi all

    Wierd question, i know, but does anyone know which actual sub was used as a set to film the movie k-19 widowmaker? Need to find out!

    Thanks
     
  11. I know im preaching to the choir here, but isn't the whole point of a sub based nuke detterent that it can't be wiped off the map in one fell swoop, whereas the RAF's nuke potential could be??? :?
     
  12. The nice thing about the bomber / D5 combo is that not only is it a bit difficult to find and therefore survivable, but more importantly, there is next to no chance of stopping it once it's on the way. CrabAir or TLAM for that matter can both be seen (RF, IR and visual) and therefore shot at and are not that challenging as targets.

    The other bit in the background is that it (allows UK plc to retain design and build skills. Half the problems with the Astute boats can be directly attributed to most of the old n bold from Vickers (& MOD) having retired between the design of Vanguard (~1988) and the start of Astute design (~1998). Virtually no-one senior left from the design of Traf back in the late 70s either. The same thing has happended on the surface front as well.
     
  13. With Iran tooling up as we speak, I think i'll take the SSN option thanks.
    Or perhaps Labour and all of the other limp wristers could take a leaf out of Peter Cook's book and hand out Anti Nuclear Umbrella's.

    Of course, an other option would be to not provoke these people in the first place and then rely on Bush to hide behind.

    It's about time the tories got back in power to get this country back on track, so the Red tie wearing idiots can get back in power in 15 years time and mess it up again. It's a cycle, build up, break down, build up, break doen...etc etc etc.
     
  14. I think it'll take a bit more than 15 years to fix the mess this lot have got us into and Mr CameronBlair doesn't look like being able to make difficult decisions.

    Still, just think of all the luvvies we could mislead with job adverts like :

    Wanted : Design artist skilled in glass sculptures and able to work on a grand scale (affinity for circular designs an advantage). Do you like a challenge? Do you like to travel to foreign lands and see your art evolve before your eyes? Have we got a job for you. An opportunity for large-scale redevelopment of an ancient cultural land has arisen, using the latest landscaping techniques. The piece will be created between approximately Tabriz and Chah Bahar. Adjust your work real-time using our state of the art surveillance satellites. Attention to detail is required, as mistakes will be difficult to rectify! Apply GWB, 1660 Pennsylvania Ave. Closing date 30/06/06.
     
  15. At least the oil would be easy to find, once the desert is nuked into glass, just walk out and look down for oil.
     
  16. Fair point, and a point half way across India is within range of a Trident operating in the Irish Sea/East Atlantic. I just think it's an option that's far too expensive and, as a deterrent, it doesn't worry an aggressor any more than taking a small battery of TLAMs to their doorstep. And would WE be the first to fire an ICBM? Cos if we did, it's Close of Play for everybody.

    The whole point of the 'deterrent' was/is to make sure the enemy knew/knows that, should it strike the first blow, even though they might annihilate us, it would spoil their whole day too. Does anybody see us - the UK - firing an ICBM first? If not, then it's a retaliation weapon.

    So which countries/organisations could mount such an attack on us that it would cause us to retaliate with ICBMs? I'm not saying they want to, but it leaves India, Pakistan, North Korea, China and Russia, plus possibly Iran. If we want a deterrent against them, we'll have to build ourselves a new submarine base in SE Asia or the Indian Ocean, as Trident has a range of 4,600 miles. Singapore, anyone? It won't happen.

    All hypothetical, of course, but it's a Forum, right?
     
  17. Geoff

    Don't forget the foul and most foreign t'other side of the channel!
     
  18. I thought that the whole idea of nuclear deterrent was the MAD theory. Wasn't that why it was always made known that our side had a bigger bang than they did. And wouldn't Princess Toady, like our PM, have to get Dubya's permission first
     
  19. Geoff

    We have a base very suitable in the right area which we currently lease to the US of A after we chucked all the locals out.

    Diago Garcia that will place near most all but north west Russia

    Nutty
     
  20. Yep, Nutty, I remembered that one after posting. Crap run ashore though - I'd want Singers or nought!
     

Share This Page