Not him personally you understand Geoffers but the concept that a judge would be doing one of his counsel and then seeing her in chambers without opposing counsel.geoffg said:
The innacuracies or inconsistancies did not trouble me that much, the interresting bit was one how they got into the right position in the first place, and how they then set about solving a problem no one else had solved before. The chats with the NO were very interesting as was the ability to go and pick bits up with the ROV. I spent a bit of time with a manned submersible picking up torpedos of the sea bottom and that was difficult enough.rosinacarley said:yes maxi, but you are seeing it from a submariners perspective. Look at it from someone who is interested in history.
I learnt a lot, I never even realised that you could have sub on sub, one has to accept the artistic inaccuracies I think to make the transmission to the layperson more relevant.
I have no idea what a non snorting U boat is, but I am not sure that it detracted from the story that was being told.
Although I am sure it pained you to see the inaccurancies, just as Judge John Deed pains me!