That makes a change

Found this one interesting:

BBC News - UN combat force to target DR Congo rebels

For decades the complaint has been that "peacekeeping" does no such thing and that it can only really be effective if the ROE allows for more than just personal protection. However, does that not then mean that the role has the potential to go beyond using armed force to prevent escalation to outright war?

Is this a sign of a change of approach? In this specific case, is it likely to do some good or will it be a case of rueing the law of unintended consequences?
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J The Quarterdeck 8
Jenny_Dabber The Corps 5
PartTimePongo Current Affairs 16

Similar threads