Telegraph reporting 9 "leaks" in 12 years

Discussion in 'Submariners' started by soleil, May 19, 2009.

Welcome to the Navy Net aka Rum Ration

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial RN website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. And that is the newspaper that is suppose to be the friend of the RN, cobbled together an unhelpful article of old news to denigrate SSn and SSBN's.

    Nutty
     
  2. Says who?

    No paper is the friend of anyone, unless they're paying in cash or favours. Labour's cosy relationship with Rupert Murdoch anyone?
     
  3. Notice how there is never any 'reading' on the so called leaked water, why? well we all know why, because the actual leak was just some demin flushing and was about as radioactive as a bottle of Robinsons Barley Water.

    It was probably on some fag packet dropped by a greenpiece nobber and they printed it without checking (or caring) if it was correct.

    The main thing that discredits the whole article is: (which we have talked through on here) -

    There is nothing 'supposedly' about it, if it was detectable, the French wouldn't have bumped into it.
    Just another load of rubbish heard at a bus stop by a man who heard something in a pub the night before.
     
  4. witsend

    witsend War Hero Book Reviewer

    This thread is all paper talk, can we sack it!
     

Share This Page