State of the fleet!!!

evasoshy

Newbie
HMs exeter unsafe to go to sea even tho it was in the middle of the sea when told this!!!!! How safe are we all at sea??????
 
A mate of mine was chippies pom on HMS Norfolk a few years ago (he's outside time done now) and was duty one weekend.
"As you do", he was bored and down the CTO having a look at anything he could get his hands on when he came across the Lloyds of London certification for the ship, which basically said NO CHANCE!! We are NOT insuring this heap for anything but scrap!
Ah, the old MOD get-out clause for warships!!
 

stumpy

War Hero
Can I ask a bone question?

I have never served onboard a type 23, but instead a 42, 22s, MWs and briefly on a CVS.

I have only briefly visited type 23s, and having come off a grotty 42 I always thought they seemed lovely. Why do they get such a raw deal from people? At least I could stand up in them, unlike on much of a type 42!!

(This is a serious question)

Cheers.
 
My last ship was the Norfolk, straight out of build, and to say it was culture shock comparing it to my previous ship, the Glasgow, would be an understatement.

As a Killick Greenie, I went from 1 in 15 duties on the Glasgow, to 1 in 5 on the Norfolk - midday to midday handover to boot!

Did that suck, or what?

Constant scrubbing out on the Norfolk, as there were hardly any JRs. In fact the sole reason there were JRs was to scrub out.

On the whole, I preferred the Glasgow.
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Book Reviewer
Streaky said:
My last ship was the Norfolk, straight out of build, and to say it was culture shock comparing it to my previous ship, the Glasgow, would be an understatement.

As a Killick Greenie, I went from 1 in 15 duties on the Glasgow, to 1 in 5 on the Norfolk - midday to midday handover to boot!

Did that suck, or what?

Constant scrubbing out on the Norfolk, as there were hardly any JRs. In fact the sole reason there were JRs was to scrub out.

On the whole, I preferred the Glasgow.
I believe this was due to the 'reverse pyramid' manning policy, which they were supposed to get rid of :? .

I've only had one Type 23 as a 3-week jolly (after spending all of my previous career at the time on Type 82/Leanders/Type 42s and I have to agree with your comments about Type 23s. But at the end of the day it's different ships - different cap tallies!
 

mikh

MIA
Streaky said:
My last ship was the Norfolk, straight out of build, and to say it was culture shock comparing it to my previous ship, the Glasgow, would be an understatement.

As a Killick Greenie, I went from 1 in 15 duties on the Glasgow, to 1 in 5 on the Norfolk - midday to midday handover to boot!

Did that suck, or what?

Constant scrubbing out on the Norfolk, as there were hardly any JRs. In fact the sole reason there were JRs was to scrub out.

On the whole, I preferred the Glasgow.
Gleaming G 1st class ship - whats duties, heard some rumours but blue card interfered with my hearing
 

FlagWagger

GCM
Book Reviewer
F169 said:
Why was ExETER considered 'unsafe' though? Sometimes even safety is not black and white
Safety is NEVER black and white, there's always a balance to be struck; everything we do involves an element of risk, usually we work in the acceptable region, frequently move to the tolerable region, and then progress to barely tolerable and finally unacceptable (and no, there are no defined boundaries between these regions either, its all a matter of judgement!).

Much of what we see reported in the popular press about "safety" is actually fatuous and based solely on the severity of consequences not the overall risk, i.e. the combination of likelihood and severity. If someone somewhere has taken a decision to withdraw a major surface platform from service then my guess is that its likely to be either a smokescreen to disguise the fact that we can't afford to operate her, or there are serious underlying design factors affecting the safety of the ship and her crew.
 

F169

War Hero
Flag Wagger - disagree, mostly it is black and white. Its totally common dog that you stop at red lights, or in a ship remain within the navigable channel entering harbour. etc etc. Risk management of safety is a pretty formalised system now which covers the grey areas doesn't it?
 
F169 said:
Flag Wagger - disagree, mostly it is black and white. Its totally common dog that you stop at red lights, or in a ship remain within the navigable channel entering harbour. etc etc. Risk management of safety is a pretty formalised system now which covers the grey areas doesn't it?

Now is safety was as simple as that a couple of my engineers would be out of a job. They spend their lives on statistical analysis of certain safety aspects
 

Clouseau

Banned
FlagWagger said:
F169 said:
Why was ExETER considered 'unsafe' though? Sometimes even safety is not black and white
<SNIP>

If someone somewhere has taken a decision to withdraw a major surface platform from service then my guess is that its likely to be either a smokescreen to disguise the fact that we can't afford to operate her, or there are serious underlying design factors affecting the safety of the ship and her crew.
I think that is somewhere near the truth. All ships require constant maintenance/refit/refurbishment if they are to remain operationally effective and safe. I suspect the cost to ensure Exeter remains safe and /or operational is now prohibitive.

Watch this space for more shock announcements?
 

Letsbeavenue

Badgeman
HMS Exeter is the oldest ship in the Fleet.
She runs on an old fashioned scheme of complement which is manpower heavy.
The Navy needs to make in-year savings quickly.
Can you guess what might happen.....? 8O
 

Clouseau

Banned
Letsbeavenue said:
HMS Exeter is the oldest ship in the Fleet.
She runs on an old fashioned scheme of complement which is manpower heavy.
The Navy needs to make in-year savings quickly.
Can you guess what might happen.....? 8O
Being the oldest ship means nothing - it is the state the ship is in and where she is in her long term maintenance cycle. I know of other ships that are far further past there sell by date.

If we're getting rid of old ships why did we sell of a couple of 23s recently?

As for the SOC, although they carry more people, current 42s aren't that much different to the rest of the surface fleet.
 

FlagWagger

GCM
Book Reviewer
F169 said:
Flag Wagger - disagree, mostly it is black and white. Its totally common dog that you stop at red lights, or in a ship remain within the navigable channel entering harbour. etc etc.
At this level, yes there are elements that at face value appear black and white. However, if you look a little deeper they can be actually hide quite sophisticated safety issues. Take the red light example - jumping a red light (from a safety engineer's perspective at least) is not in itself hazardous, the hazard is that you enter a road junction that someone else is potentially occupying, the use of traffic lights to control traffic flow is a measure to reduce the risk of this happening to acceptable levels. There may be times when it is perfectly safe to proceed through a red light, say for example at 0300 when the junction is quiet; how do you distinguish between these occasions? Typically we don't and end up with a general rule, (such as stop!) to address the worst case scenario.

F169 said:
Risk management of safety is a pretty formalised system now which covers the grey areas doesn't it?
Risk management may be formalised, but much of it comes down to engineering judgement - the reason that we see stories in the press about "safety" that defy common dog is that quite simply someone has taken the black and white approach; the grey areas actually rely on appropriate application of engineering judgement (and common sense), while a formalised approach to risk taking attempts to take the tick box mentality. In general (and I hate generalisations!) its usually obvious when a "system" is clearly safe or clearly unsafe, the interesting problems are when things change slowly and start moving from safe to unsafe - at what point does the level of risk become intolerable?

One other area that you may want to consider, is that society does not have an absolute tolerance of safety/risk. Many people are happy to jump onto a plane to take them off on their holidays yet are unwilling to, say, live next door to a nuclear power plant, yet statistically it could be argued that flying is inherently more hazardous than living near Sizewell!
 

Not_a_boffin

War Hero
Suspect it's because her DP4 is due shortly and as she's not part of the "Liverpool 5" (directed refits under SSS) it could be easily cut. As Letsbe Ave points out above, in-year savings are current flavour. Doubt that safety is actually an issue for the ship as she's had the WCFT A&A, unless MWIPT have come across something seriously awry in their previous calcs........
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
W state of the fleet The Fleet 4
MoD_RSS Welcoming historic agreements and working towards a two-state solution MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Julia Lopez speech at techUK’s ‘Building the Smarter State’ Conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Counter-drone tech and state-of-the-art radar for the RAF MoD News 0
MoD_RSS DIO completes state-of-the-art gym for Royal Navy MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State message to the NHS on the coronavirus response MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Police given new powers to tackle hostile state activity MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Response to the Secretary of State's announcement of 12 August 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed Professor Roger Bland, OBE, and Dr Megan Gooch as Chair and Trustee of the Treasure Valuation Committee. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS CBILS: EU State Aid Rules and “undertakings in difficulty” MoD News 0
MoD_RSS PM meeting with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo: 21 July 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland annual report MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Local government ethical standards: letter to Secretary of State MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has reappointed Mel Young as the Scotland Member of UK Sport. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has reappointed Loyd Grossman as Chair of The Royal Parks. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed George Lucas as the Northern Ireland Member of UK Sport. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has reappointed Robert Noel and Professor Dame Janet Thornton as Trustees of the Natural History Museum. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State appointments to National Park Authorities and AONB Conservation Boards MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has approved the appointment of Venki Ramakrishnan as a Board Member of the British Library. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Letter from the Minister of State, Cabinet Office about the CSPL review of electoral regulation MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has reappointed Stephen Cohen as Commissioner of the Gambling Commission. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed John Mothersole as the England Chair of the National Lottery Community Fund. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed Kate Still as the Scotland Chair of the National Lottery Community Fund. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Minister Adams statement on clearance operations in Rakhine State, Myanmar MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Urging a negotiated two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Letter from Secretary of State to Chair of Transport Select Committee MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has reappointed three Trustees to the Horniman Museum. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed five new Trustees to the National Museums Liverpool. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has reappointed Sue Wilkinson OBE as a Trustee of Historic Royal Palaces. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS New police powers to tackle hostile state activity MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Ministerial appointments at the office of the Secretary of State for Scotland MoD News 0
MoD_RSS COVID-19: Letter to Secretary of State from SSAC MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed Chris Pilling and Ismail Amla as Board Members of UK Sport. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed Nick de Bois as Chair of the Visit England Advisory Board. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed Rt Hon Sir Patrick McLoughlin CH as Chair of the British Tourist Authority. MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Readout of Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace’s phone call with US Secretary of Defense Dr. Mark T. Esper MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State Co-Chairs Joint Ministerial Covid-19 Conference Call MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Turkmenistan celebrates State Flag Day and Constitution Day MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State Co-Chairs Third Covid-19 Joint Ministerial Conference Call MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Secretary of State has appointed four new Commissioners to the Gambling Commission. MoD News 1
MoD_RSS State of emergency in Yemen: Minister for the Middle East's statement MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State for Transport delivers daily coronavirus update (24 April 2020) MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Response to 9 April direction from Secretary of State for Education MoD News 0
D Montana is now the only State......... Diamond Lil's 19
MoD_RSS Coronavirus (COVID-19): letter from the Secretary of State to the local government workforce MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Response to 31 March direction from Secretary of State for Education MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State hosts virtual roundtable with NI business leaders MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State for Northern Ireland welcomes additional funding to tackle coronavirus MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State Co-Chairs Covid-19 Joint Ministerial Conference Call MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State appoints Paul Darling OBE QC as Chair and Anne Lambert CMG as an Independent Board Member of the Horserace Betting Levy Board. MoD News 0
Similar threads


















































Latest Threads

Top