Navy Net - Royal Navy Community

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Speech: Call for Accountability for Chemical Weapons Use in Syria


War Hero
Thank you Mr President, and thank you also to High Representative Nakamitsu for your briefing.

We are holding this session in the open Chamber today after a series of reported chemical attacks in Eastern Ghouta within the last month, as the Assad regime continues its merciless bombing and killing of civilians. Over the weekend, there was a further allegation of use of chemical weapons in Idlib, as well as airstrikes by pro-regime forces which reportedly hit three hospitals, leaving doctors scrambling to remove premature babies from their incubators to move them. I cannot say move them to safety because the reality is that, for the citizens of Idlib and Eastern Ghouta, nowhere is safe. Mr President, we are appalled by this violence and the reported deliberate targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure and call upon all parties to the conflict to uphold International Humanitarian Law and protect civilians.

The OPCW is already investigating reports of chemical weapons use in recent weeks, but establishing who was responsible for such use will be much more difficult, because Russia three times vetoed continuation of the independent, expert Joint Investigative Mechanism, in order to protect the Assad regime.

We would welcome any serious attempt to re-establish a properly independent investigation and attribution mechanism to continue the meticulous work of the JIM.

Sadly, we do not yet see that in the Russian proposal.

Any successor investigation must be empowered to investigate all use of chemical weapons, whoever the perpetrator may be. Yet the Russian proposal focuses only on non-state actors. We have repeatedly condemned Daesh for its use of chemical weapons, which the JIM clearly reported. But given Assad’s track record of chemical weapons use and his failure to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention, it is imperative that any new mechanism also investigate chemical weapons use by the Syrian regime.

A second objection is the proposal that experts would merely gather evidence, leaving this Council to decide what it meant. No other UN expert panel that I know of is specifically prohibited from reaching conclusions and reporting its findings to the Council on what has happened. We are not specialists on chemical weapons at this table; we rely on independent, UN-selected expert panels. The entire purpose of the JIM was that an independent panel reached conclusions on the basis of the evidence, taking it out of the hands of us, the Member States, the Council Members, because we had been unable to agree. Russia’s proposal looks designed to avoid the political embarrassment of having to use its veto power to defend the indefensible, when independent bodies report on what has truly happened. The underlying intent seems to be to ensure there are no clear conclusions in future reports.

Thirdly, we object to the proposal’s demands that the standard of proof should be ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. This standard is not used in any other comparable past or present UN investigation. It is used in relation to criminal prosecutions in courts of law, which have significantly greater investigative powers and independence than Russia’s text proposes.

And finally, Mr President, this proposal insists on site visits. This is despite the explicit provision in the Chemical Weapons Convention for other ways to gather relevant evidence, recognising the difficulty of safe and timely visits. There is no scientific basis for this proposal. It is simply an attempt to hamstring future investigations and to discredit the JIM. Russia, of course, made much of the absence of a site visit to Khan Sheikhoun, despite the fact that the Assad regime handed over to the UN samples from the site, which contained chemical signatures unique to regime sarin, obviating the need for such a visit.

It is for these reasons that the text is unacceptable. The JIM set a high standard of impartiality and expertise; we expect that standard from any future mechanism.

Mr President,

The Syrian regime of course claims not to have used chemical weapons.

Yet over the years, two separate reports from the JIM under separate leadership panels, drawing on a broad range of respected independent international experts, concluded that the regime used chlorine at least three times – in Talmenes in April 2014, and in Sarmin and Qmenas in March 2015, and used sarin to attack Khan Sheikhoun in April 2017.

And let us remember, too, that infamous attack in Eastern Ghouta in August 2013, when a separate UN investigation found that sarin was used to kill hundreds and injure thousands.

That attack brought near universal international condemnation. And, following our concerted international pressure, Syria joined the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Syria promised – as it was legally obliged to do – to destroy and abandon its chemical weapons programme. Yet they have been unable to satisfy inspectors that they have done so. We have to ask ourselves: why not?

In 2013, Russia promised to act as a guarantor for the Assad regime’s compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention. Yet month after month we all sit here and we hear that Assad has not done so. So why does Russia not compel the Syrian regime to comply with its obligations and make it impossible for them to use chemical weapons?

Mr President,

Tragically, for the people of Syria, the regime continues to use chemical weapons with impunity. If it is confirmed that Assad has again used chemical weapons on his own people, it would not only be another entry in the catalogue of his war crimes.

It would also be another attack on us all: members of the United Nations who have worked for decades – in the words of the Chemical Weapons Convention – “for the sake of all mankind, to exclude completely the possibility of the use of chemical weapons”.

Through history, our peoples have said “never again”: among others from the First World War battlefields; in Ethiopia; in Manchuria; in Saddam Hussein’s attacks on Iran, and on Iraqi Kurds.

Let us on this Council stand up for the peoples of the United Nations, determined that these abhorrent chemical weapons should never be used.

Let us stand up for the people of Syria and give them a real investigation into those responsible for the use of chemical weapons, an investigation which pursues justice for the horrific crimes committed against them.

Let us signal our determination to pursue accountability through all means available, even if one member of the Security Council is currently preventing us from taking action here.

Thank you Mr President.

Continue reading...
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for Humanitarian Aid and Government Accountability in DRC MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: We call for an end to the use of sexual violence in South Sudan MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Together let's renew the call for action to defeat dementia MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: DFID Ghana Country Director's speech at Fleming Fund's evening reception of the AMR Call to Action summit MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for Humanitarian Assistance in Syria MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for the Need to Protect Women's Rights in Afghanistan MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Reiterating the call for a 30-day ceasefire, without delay, in Syria MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for a Political Settlement to Address the Humanitarian Crisis and Security... MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for Security Council Members to Vote in Favour of Resolution on Yemen MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call to Stop the Devastation Facing the People of Eastern Ghouta MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for Safe, Voluntary, and Dignified Return of Rohingya Refugees MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call to Redouble Efforts to Defeat Daesh MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for Humanitarian Access in Syria MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Call for consequences for those who obstruct the negotiation process, including... MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Robert Jenrick's speech to the Centre for Social Justice MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Secretary of State for International Trade NFU conference speech MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Environment Secretary, George Eustice, speech at NFU Conference 2021 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Prime Minister's speech at the Munich Security Conference: 19 February 2021 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Landmark proposals to strengthen free speech at universities MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Scottish Secretary speech on Scottish farming MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Oliver Dowden speech to RESET 2021 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Education Secretary speech to Education Policy Institute on remote learning MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Helen Stephenson CBE speech at the ICAEW Charity Conference 2021 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS COP26 President's keynote speech at the Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week summit MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Economic Update speech MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Environment Secretary speech on gene-editing consultation: Oxford Farming Conference 2021 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech on coronavirus restriction tiers, vaccines and testing MoD News 0
MoD_RSS ‘Fight For Fairness’ speech to set out government’s new approach to equality MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Housing Minister’s speech at the Insider Midlands Residential Property Conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary's speech on defence reform MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Glenys Stacey's speech at Inside Government Apprenticeship Conference 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Housing Minister’s speech at HOMES UK conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Minister for Pensions Guy Opperman's speech on a new direction for trustee stewardship MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Oliver Dowden speech to the Law Family Commission on Civil Society MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Baroness Goldie speech at 25th Conference of States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Security Minister speech to the Royal United Services Institute MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Spending Review 2020 speech MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Attorney General speech at the London Panel Induction Event MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Housing Minister’s speech at PlaceShapers annual conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Housing Minister's speech at Savills Annual Housing Seminar MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Minister for Equalities delivers International Men's Day speech MoD News 0
MoD_RSS The Economic Secretary’s keynote speech to TheCityUK 2020 Conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary's speech at the Defence Space Conference 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Dame Glenys Stacey: speech to AOC's FE Summit, 18 November 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS TheCityUK speech: Liz Truss highlights importance of digital, data and services trade MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Matt Warman's speech on digital identity at Identity Week 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Prince of Wales speech at the Bundestag, Berlin: 15 November 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech to NHS Clinical Commissioners conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS John Whittingdale's Speech at Open Data Institute Summit 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech to Airport Operators Association, November 2020 MoD News 0
Similar threads

New Posts