Some ships we are keeping!!

Discussion in 'Current Affairs' started by noemis, Jan 9, 2007.

Welcome to the Navy Net aka Rum Ration

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial RN website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I'm told this lease-contract is proving very successful.
  2. Do you think that it will become more common to lease warships in the future?
  3. Interesting idea.... extending the concept of CA (Contracting for Availability) and perhaps call it COC? - Contracting for Operational Capability

    ....couldn't think of a suitable word begining with K......
  4. What happened to the trimaran trials vessel, was that a successful hull form?
  5. She was sold to Gardline for survey work in the Swapps and has just been taken up for a contract with the RAN. She'll be modified to act as a patol vessel including a brig for up to 40 to put illegals in.

    Trimarans are all well and good, but in the risk-averse climate of today, it ain't gonna happen.
  6. Seadog

    Seadog War Hero Moderator

    In answer to your question F169

    RV Triton

    NAB's answer noted too.
  7. I think you will find this is the way it will go with some large and expensive defence company having it off with the defence budget building and leasing the ships
  8. Where do I start?

    We now have 4 ships that we lease from the builder, Severn, Tyne, Mersey and now Clyde. These ships are built to commercial standards and I have heard nothing but good things about the first 3, Clyde is still working up for her deployment south. They are marketed by VT as EEZ management vessel, that is Economic Exclusion Zone.

    The first 3 are armed with a 20mm gun and a couple of GPMGs, however, Clyde has been fitted with improved armament for her role of protecting the Falklands, a 30mm gun! Anybody else thinks this is scary? Still not bad for a civvies ship we are leasing. But shouldn’t we have leased something like this instead?

    A leased multi-purpose corvette would be more appropriate than a fishery protection vessel for the Falklands I think. Managed in the same way as the River class, this could have provided a cheaper platform than a T23, but vastly more capable than an OPV. Whitehall seems to be getting the cost/performance balance all wrong, it seems to be applying commercial just in time policies to military planning! HELLO!!

    It isn’t only Argentina who is interested in the Falklands, it’s one of those oily issues again, the natural resources of the Islands are what we are protecting, not a handful of Bennies. So why not both, Clyde and a corvette working together and thus releasing the scarce resource that is the T22s, T23s and t42s to doing the heavy stuff, the war fighting. They could be paid for by releasing the mineral extraction rights for the Falklands, and thus confirming our sovereignty, and by licensing the fishing in and around the Islands more effectively, by their very presence.
  9. What ships are we not keeping?
  10. what will happen to all the skimmers working on the ship, could i still get a job in the navy if it happens?

Share This Page