Soldiers and Veterans suicides exceed Afghan toll

Ninja_Stoker

War Hero
Moderator
#2
The mental health aspect of warfare is very often overlooked by politicians and there is, without doubt a ticking timebomb in the coming years aftermath of the Afghanistan conflict.

Because this item gets little coverage, there are many suffering from a history of mental health issues who wish to join the Armed Forces and simply do not appreciate the significance of the condition and the reason the rules are so stringently applied.
DASA said:
During the three-month period April - June 2012, 954 new episodes of care for mental disorder were identified within UK Armed Forces personnel, representing a rate of 5.0 per 1,000 strength [1 in 200 or 0.5%].

For the 954 personnel assessed for a new episode of care with a mental disorder, there were some statistically significant findings:

Army and RAF personnel had significantly higher rates of mental disorder (5.3 per 1,000 strength [1 in 188 or 0.53%]). and 5.7 per 1,000 strength [1 in 176 or 0.57%]).respectively) compared to Royal Navy personnel and Royal Marine personnel (3.2 per 1,000 strength [1 in 312 or 0.32%]).and 3.0 per 1,000 strength respectively [1 in 333 or 0.3%]).

The rate of mental disorder was higher in females than males (11.6 per 1,000 strength [1 in 86 or 1.16%]).and 4.3 per 1,000 strength respectively [1 in 232 or 0.43%]).).

Rates of those assessed with a mental health disorder in Other Ranks were higher than Officers. Ranks had a significantly higher rate of mental disorder at 5.5 per 1,000 strength compared to Officers at 2.9 per 1,000 strength. The differences between Ranks and Officers may be due to educational and/or socio-economic background, where both higher educational attainment and higher socio-economic background are associated with lower levels of mental health disorder (Meltzer et all.,2003). The majority of Officers (with the exception of those promoted from the Ranks) are recruited as graduates of the higher education system, whilst the majority of other Ranks are recruited straight from school and often from the inner cities (particularly for the Army).

These findings are consistent with previous reports.

Comparing those deployed on Op TELIC and/or Op HERRICK and those not deployed to either operation:

The overall rate of mental disorders for those who had previously deployed compared to those who have not previously deployed was not significantly different.
Defence Analytical Services and Advice: UK Armed Forces Quarterly Mental Health Report
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#3
Any suicide as a result of combat stress/post-traumatic stress disorder is tragic, but the media comparison with deaths in conflict in Afghanistan is unnecessarily emotive or provocative. The MoD has quite correctly said that rates of suicide and PTSD within the serving military were lower than comparative rates in the civilian population.

I am unaware of Panorama's agenda for their programme on the matter but I would not be surprised if they claim that not enough is being done for serving military personnel and veterans from recent conflicts, which I don't believe is the case. Many charities and mental health organisations are doing sterling work treating those with these issues, but regrettably they cannot save every person. But the suicide rate would be significantly higher if that support network was not available.

I think a degree of context and perspective should be demonstrated before the Duty Driver signs for the keys to the collective Outrage Bus... :shock:
 
A

angrydoc

Guest
#4
Being technical, those who took their own lives once they returned to the UK did not die whilst deployed, hence no mention in the National Memorial Arboretum. Trying to sort out whose deaths are due to HERRICK and whose are due to something else would be very difficult.

As SPB says, this looks a bit like Panorama trying to make a story out of nothing. Yes, every death should be looked at to see if it could have been prevented, but you cannot wrap every individual in cotton wool when they do what we expect them to do.

This is one of the reasons we are so tight on who joins with a mental health background. A strong predictor of MH issues in the future is MH issues in the past.
 
#5
My concern is not having your name scribed on the National Aboretum wall. You do not have to be deployed , to have your name on the wall. I know of quiet a few "accidents" of oppos whose names are on the wall !!!!!! Who died.... Abroad, and at Home, and on leave . So it is not right, to exclude suicide at home...rant over
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#6
It is likely that the personnel you are referring to are included on the Roll of Honour but not on the Armed Forces Memorial, which: "[...] honours those members of the Armed Forces (Regular and Reserve) who were killed on duty while performing functions attributable to the special circumstances and requirements of the Armed Forces, or as a result of terrorist action, and those who died while deployed on designated operations."

Tragic though the circumstances of suicide are, I cannot see how their names can be included according to that criteria (although they will be rememembered locally). I fail to see why you are angry about this? :?
 
#7
It is likely that the personnel you are referring to are included on the Roll of Honour but not on the Armed Forces Memorial, which: "[...] honours those members of the Armed Forces (Regular and Reserve) who were killed on duty while performing functions attributable to the special circumstances and requirements of the Armed Forces, or as a result of terrorist action, and those who died while deployed on designated operations."

Tragic though the circumstances of suicide are, I cannot see how their names can be included according to that criteria (although they will be rememembered locally). I fail to see why you are angry about this? :?
I am referring to the Armed forces Memorial wall at the Arboretum in Staffordshire....re my last post regarding "accidents ". I know for a fact !! and can confirm this
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#8
I am referring to the Armed forces Memorial wall at the Arboretum...
So was I - the reference in my post was from their own website.

It was commissioned for a specific purpose, as described in my post above. If it displayed the names of every person in the Armed Forces that had ever died from whatever cause, it would be exponentially massive. Again, why the outrage? :?
 

Ninja_Stoker

War Hero
Moderator
#9
To be honest, there seems to be a common misconception that anyone who goes to war is automatically a `hero`. I certainly wasn't, I was shit scared.

Similarly anyone that goes to war and later tops themself, has not necessarily done so because they went to war - many don`t even hear a shot fired in anger.

...but anyone injured mentally in war and who is discharged because of it, is as much a casualty as anyone physically injured.

Where it becomes more difficult to determine is when the individual leaves fully fit but later claims mental injury retrospectively. A difficult call due to the fact the injury cannot be seen and there are sadly callous fraudsters who capitalise on this fact, to the detriment of genuine sufferers.
 
#10
To be honest, there seems to be a common misconception that anyone who goes to war is automatically a `hero`. I certainly wasn't, I was shit scared.

Similarly anyone that goes to war and later tops themself, has not necessarily done so because they went to war - many don`t even hear a shot fired in anger.

...but anyone injured mentally in war and who is discharged because of it, is as much a casualty as anyone physically injured.

Where it becomes more difficult to determine is when the individual leaves fully fit but later claims mental injury retrospectively. A difficult call due to the fact the injury cannot be seen and there are sadly callous fraudsters who capitalise on this fact, to the detriment of genuine sufferers.
But NS, a lot of people do not start to show signs/symptoms of MH problems until much later in life. I know some ex matlots whose problems only started after leaving the mob and if you go to any of the Combat Stress houses, you will find people who have only started getting MH problems 20 - 30 odd years after the incident itself.
 
#11
scouse. You make an understable and fair point but:

Trying to sort out whose deaths are due to HERRICK and whose are due to something else would be very difficult.
Change HERRICK for any Op (or maybe even severe beastings during Service time) and that's one hell of a forensic investigation. Looking from a wider view, how many poor buggers die from heart conditions brought about by things they did in the mob day in, day out?
 

Ninja_Stoker

War Hero
Moderator
#12
But NS, a lot of people do not start to show signs/symptoms of MH problems until much later in life. I know some ex matlots whose problems only started after leaving the mob and if you go to any of the Combat Stress houses, you will find people who have only started getting MH problems 20 - 30 odd years after the incident itself.
Yep that's why it is difficult to determine the cause. If it occurs many years later, as it clearly does, what is to say it's directly service attributed? Many civilians suffer mental health issues also and often there are multiple contributing factors.

I'd not suggest it isn't service attributed, but unless it manifests itself and results in medical treatment (and often discharge) whilst serving, it is extremely difficult to determine what is the precise cause.
 
#13
My point was this.......L/Sgt Collins was a serving soldier at the time of his death on 1 January 2012 but his name will not be on the memorial. "It's heartbreaking because Daniel would have been so proud to have his name carved somewhere," said Mrs Collins. "Soldiers with PTSD are exactly the same. They're victims of war and they should be treated exactly the same." Quote. Unquote....ps My original History post is now in CA...where I seldom ,or if ever post!!!!!!for the obvious reasons !!!!Now awaiting for the wisdom of SD:ncool: on this matter
 
Last edited:
#14
Because MH problems are kept hidden. Especially whilst serving and then when you come out it is still kept hidden, until some unrelated incident triggers it.
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#15
My point was this.......L/Sgt Collins was a serving soldier at the time of his death on 1 January 2012 but his name will not be on the memorial. "It's heartbreaking because Daniel would have been so proud to have his name carved somewhere," said Mrs Collins. "Soldiers with PTSD are exactly the same. They're victims of war and they should be treated exactly the same." Quote.
And from a BBC news source about the same soldier:

Ms Roach [L/Sgt Collins' girlfriend at the time] said the Army was "brilliant" with the support it gave to L/Sgt Collins, and he received regular counselling.
So, tragic though his death was, what else can the MOD do? And again, his death was not "in service, on operations" (according to the criteria established by the National Memorial Arboretum, as posted previously). Either way, RIP to Dan Collins and others who have passed away in similar circumstances.
 

janner

MIA
Book Reviewer
#16
Scouse, as others have said, where do you draw the line. During the early 1970's whilst a serving Police Officer I got to know several "Men of the Road" a number of whom were ex servicemen from WW2. Among them were two that stood out, one had been LRDG/SAS and the other had the MC from getting other crewmen out of his tank when it brewed up. (I was able to verify that both were as stated). Had dealing with these two several times and was able to do little things to help them (bed and breakfast at the nick on really bad nights etc.) Both subsequently died from the abuse of their systems through drink and rough living. There is no doubt in my mind that both had what would now be called PTSD brought on by their war time experiences, should they be included on any memorial?
 
#17
Scouse, as others have said, where do you draw the line. During the early 1970's whilst a serving Police Officer I got to know several "Men of the Road" a number of whom were ex servicemen from WW2. Among them were two that stood out, one had been LRDG/SAS and the other had the MC from getting other crewmen out of his tank when it brewed up. (I was able to verify that both were as stated). Had dealing with these two several times and was able to do little things to help them (bed and breakfast at the nick on really bad nights etc.) Both subsequently died from the abuse of their systems through drink and rough living. There is no doubt in my mind that both had what would now be called PTSD brought on by their war time experiences, should they be included on any memorial?
There are plenty of different memorials at the NMA. They dont have to have their names on the 'wall'. What reason is there for not having one for those that have taken their own lives? Many people just need a focal point for their grief, hence the memorials for stillborn children for instance
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#18
There are plenty of different memorials at the NMA. They dont have to have their names on the 'wall'. What reason is there for not having one for those that have taken their own lives?
Well feel free to petition a campaign for that to happen. I would support it, but I think it's futile.

Many people just need a focal point for their grief, hence the memorials for stillborn children for instance
They already do -at their grave where they are buried or wherever their ashes are scattered.
 
#19
Well feel free to petition a campaign for that to happen. I would support it, but I think it's futile.

.


They already do -at their grave where they are buried or wherever their ashes are scattered.
I'm not suggesting a campaign, I'm just saying why shouldn't there be one.


There is already a memorial for stillborn children at the NMA, that's my point
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top