Scott/Shackleton who would you rather work for ?

Who would you rather work for?

  • Ernest Shackleton

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    795

clanky

War Hero
I recall once discussing the idea that naval officerss divide into camps.
The Scotts and the Shackleton's.
Which camp would you rather work for, and why?

Before anyone asks, I see myself more as a Chippy McNeish!
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
Uh! Amundson, he won by a month and got his men out! "whole and hearty!" Just to show I won't always agree with you Maxi :lol:
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
Yeh I know, not used to getting a choice! I have therefore had to agree and go with Shackleton.........Doh!
 

clanky

War Hero
chieftiff said:
Uh! Amundson, he won by a month and got his men out! "whole and hearty!" Just to show I won't always agree with you Maxi :lol:
The Amundson expedition was a cynical PR stunt, without any of the scientific rigour of the British expeditions. Its a well known fact that Amundson only did it in order to clinch a sponsorship deal with Helly-Hansen.
 
clanky said:
chieftiff said:
Uh! Amundson, he won by a month and got his men out! "whole and hearty!" Just to show I won't always agree with you Maxi :lol:
The Amundson expedition was a cynical PR stunt, without any of the scientific rigour of the British expeditions. Its a well known fact that Amundson only did it in order to clinch a sponsorship deal with Helly-Hansen.
All very well, but is your choice to be dead, even if it is a 'noble' death because you did the honorable thing, or alive and sponsored and first.

I know where my vote lies.

Peter
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
There you go again Maxi, now my votes back with the Noggi: Alive, sponsored, first, famous with a great career ahead of him......even if he did blow his fortune on that new fangled aviation thing. And I don't care if it's not an option I want to vote for Amundson.

How do I take my vote back??
 
chieftiff said:
There you go again Maxi, now my votes back with the Noggi Alive, sponsored, first, famous with a great career ahead of him......even if he did blow his fortune on that new fangled aviation thing. And I don't care if it's not an option I want to vote for Amundson.

How do I take my vote back??
I think as we only got the two options we are stuck with it, but between ourselves we know, and that should be good enough.

Peter
 
Dr. David Livingstone (1813-1873), Scottish doctor and missionary

Cos he came back, went to warm places, and could be wound up as he was a God Bother-er.

Nutty
 
Nutty said:
Dr. David Livingstone (1813-1873), Scottish doctor and missionary

Cos he came back, went to warm places, and could be wound up as he was a God Bother-er.

Nutty
Ah those were the days when with little encouragement you coulkd get god botherers to go and wander round Africa for a few years and give us some peace at home.

Peter
 

Dangermouse

Badgeman
Have a read of Ranulph Fiennes biography 'Scott'. Only one choice for me. Scott was a true hero and an inspired leader. Fiennes book explains a great deal and goes a long way to putting the record straight.
 

clanky

War Hero
Dangermouse said:
Have a read of Ranulph Fiennes biography 'Scott'. Only one choice for me. Scott was a true hero and an inspired leader. Fiennes book explains a great deal and goes a long way to putting the record straight.
Fienne's book on Scott was written in order to redress the criticisms of Scotts conduct of the expedition which began to emerge in the late 70s. IMHO he does an excellent job of doing so. Reading the story written by one who has actually travelled to the pole is also interesting.
 

Chunky_Monkey

Midshipman
Shackleton would be my choice, although they obviously both have their own merits. I am no expert on either of them but from the little I know I pick Shackleton because when it came to choosing who went with him to reach South Georgia he picked the weakest of the men and left the strong ones behind to await rescue. It would have been an easy choice for him to take the strong men with him and leave the rest to their fate, but he took the hardest route and by doing so saved all his men. I admire that because being a good officer is sometimes about taking the difficult path.
 

fido

MIA
Chunky_Monkey said:
Shackleton would be my choice, although they obviously both have their own merits. I am no expert on either of them but from the little I know I pick Shackleton because when it came to choosing who went with him to reach South Georgia he picked the weakest of the men and left the strong ones behind to await rescue. It would have been an easy choice for him to take the strong men with him and leave the rest to their fate, but he took the hardest route and by doing so saved all his men. I admire that because being a good officer is sometimes about taking the difficult path.
Spot on Chunky! Shackleton was a true leader in the best sense - he was never RN having joined the MN straight from school (Dulwich) at 16 years old and, being Anglo Irish, he was determined to follow the (then) Victorian tradition of exploration and served, firstly in sailing ships around Cape Horn, passed his various tickets as 3rd, 2nd Mate and Master before moving to steam ships with the Welsh Shire Line and then the Union Castle Line before achieving greatness as a polar explorer. His masterful achievement in saving his men is surely the mark of a true leader.

I've had the privilege of visiting his grave in Grytviken in South Georgia on three occasions during the past 40 years (once involuntarily in 1982)and have never ceased to be impressed by his guts, courage and personality. Scott is a mere shadow.

Yours aye,

fido
 

Chunky_Monkey

Midshipman
Cheers Fido. I knew Shackleton was MN and not RN - which makes his achievement all the more remarkable in some ways as he may well not have had the same kind of training in leadership that someone like Scott would have done.

Have not been to visit his grave, but maybe I'll get there one day...

Signing off for the weekend.

Yours aye

Chunky
 

GCYZ

Lantern Swinger
Chunky_Monkey said:
Cheers Fido. I knew Shackleton was MN and not RN -
Shackleton was RNR, which in those days was MN officers who could be called up in wartime (As opposed to RNVR who where civilians). I read recently that he joined the RNR in order to gain support for his expeditions as the RN held sway over most polar exploration.
 

fido

MIA
GCYZ said:
Chunky_Monkey said:
Cheers Fido. I knew Shackleton was MN and not RN -
Shackleton was RNR, which in those days was MN officers who could be called up in wartime (As opposed to RNVR who where civilians). I read recently that he joined the RNR in order to gain support for his expeditions as the RN held sway over most polar exploration.
Thanks GCYZ,

I think that Shackleton accepted a RNR commission as a Sub Lieutenant to allow him to act as third mate on joining Discovery in 1900 - Scott has just been promoted Commander from Lieutenant (no Lt Cdrs in those days) in order to lead the National Antartic Expedition. Curiously, both also became Freemasons at around the same time - the Navy Lodge. Undoubtedly there was conflict between the Royal Geographic Society and the Admiralty. The expedition was the brainchild of Sir Clements Markham, president of the RGS but, curiously, the Admiralty was not keen on providing a ship or seconding RN officers - hence Discovery was built (a less than ideal vessel and twice the cost of a more suitable Norwegion design) and the mix or RN/MN officers.

If you get the opportunity, 'SHACKLETON' by Roland Huntford (Abacus Books) is a terrific read - all 800 pages!

Yours aye,

fido
 

Dangermouse

Badgeman
Think I'll give that one a miss and look for a more reliable source.

Huntford's The Last Place on Earth gives a very unflattering treatment of Scott, and made adverse comparison of the planning and execution of the large and well-funded British expedition against Amundsen's one.

Fiennes' book rebutts Huntford's attacks upon Scott. He points out that as he lacked experience of Polar travel and man-hauling, Huntford was not qualified to comment on Scott's technical deficiencies. Fiennes also accuses Huntford of selective quotation editing, and of even inventing stories for his version of events. He makes a very sound case for casting significant doubt on the accuracy of Huntford's account.
 

fido

MIA
Dangermouse said:
Think I'll give that one a miss and look for a more reliable source.

Huntford's The Last Place on Earth gives a very unflattering treatment of Scott, and made adverse comparison of the planning and execution of the large and well-funded British expedition against Amundsen's one.

Fiennes' book rebutts Huntford's attacks upon Scott. He points out that as he lacked experience of Polar travel and man-hauling, Huntford was not qualified to comment on Scott's technical deficiencies. Fiennes also accuses Huntford of selective quotation editing, and of even inventing stories for his version of events. He makes a very sound case for casting significant doubt on the accuracy of Huntford's account.
Thanks Dangermouse,

Huntsford was not the only writer to make unfavourable comments about Scott but, in his book 'SHACKLETON', he was not discussing Scott v Amudsen in the race to the pole - rather Shackleton's early life, the 1900/01 expedition in Discovery, his subsequent exploits in Endurance and the subsequent retrieval of a seemingly impossible situation. It was, therefore, a book about Shackleton and not Scott. As for Fiennes, I regret that I am not a supporter of him or his lack of academia - but, of course, the reading and analysis of various commentators allows us all to form our own opinions and I am therefore grateful for his.

Yours aye,

fido
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MoD_RSS PM call with Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison: 14 March 2020 MoD News 0
soleil FB: HMNB Devonport: HMS Scott Pauses For Reflection Over One Of The Navy’s Most Hallowed Sites History 2
MoD_RSS HMS Scott provides support for search MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: British High Commissioner, Scott Wightman's speech at HM the Queen's Birthday Party 2019 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Address by H.E. MR Keith Scott, British High Commissioner, at a reception to celebrate the birthday of HM Queen Elizabeth II MoD News 0
Waspie LACMN Jim Scott RIP The Fleet Air Arm 0
MoD_RSS News story: Lance Corporal Scott Hetherington has died MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Fatality notice: Flight Lieutenants Alan Scott and Geraint Roberts have died MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: HMS Scott returns to Plymouth MoD News 0
Naval_Families_Federation Win Tickets to Scott’s Last Expedition – At the Natural History Museum, London Current Affairs 0
MoD_RSS HMS Scott ready to deploy Current Affairs 0
MoD_RSS HMS Scott Returns From The Antarctic The Fleet 0
MoD_RSS Survey ship Scott back on ice patrol The Fleet 0
soleil Navy News: "National Elf Service To The Rescue On HMS Scott" The Fleet 0
soleil Navy News: "Scott Takes Pole Position Again" The Fleet 0
soleil BBC: "HMS Scott Docks In Cardiff Bay" The Fleet 0
Passed-over_Loggie Capt R F Scott History 0
D HMS Scott arrives for Fleet week! Current Affairs 2
MoD_RSS By endurance we conquer - what Shackleton can teach us today MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Sledge and flag from Shackleton’s Nimrod expedition at risk of being lost abroad MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Navy duo to retrace Shackleton's epic journey Current Affairs 12
MoD_RSS Royal Navy sailors survey Shackleton's island Current Affairs 0
C Ice Patrol - Ch 5 23 Apr - Shackleton Walk - Glacier Glasses The Corps 2
WannabeAdmiral Rather confusing TMU Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 1
W Looking to Join RNR but nearest establishment is rather far away Royal Naval Reserve (RNR) 4
MoD_RSS Speech: Building a British military fit for future challenges rather than past conflicts MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Building a British Military Fit for Future Challenges Rather then Past Conflicts MoD News 0
BristolBastard David Cameron confirms HMS Prince of Wales will be operated by RN rather than sold or mothballed Current Affairs 29
S Why Officers rather than Ratings? The Fleet Air Arm 43
3yearstilltx With preserved pension now catching up with CPI index linking at 60 rather than 55... Finance & Pensions 17
angry_mac Europe? Id rather be skint. Current Affairs 42
trelawney126 Now thats rather Odd The Gash Barge 0
F Hey, seeking some rather specific info Submariners 15
soleil Pompey News: "The Rather Less Glamorous Side Of The Era Of Steam" History 7
R Security Questionnaire (rather complex problem) Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 9
W We'd rather fcuk than play footie Diamond Lil's 2
thereverend Rather unusual spam Diamond Lil's 3
C20 Rather old for Raleigh?? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 22
WhizzbangDai Would you rather... Diamond Lil's 10
Aldis Would you rather ....... ? The Corps 2
Nails Marines unarmed combat rather unrealistic The Corps 46
slim CRASH VICTIM 'WOULD RATHER DIE THAN BE STOPPED' Diamond Lil's 24
W my rather large in box Site Issues 6
W which would you rather work for? The Gash Barge 15
Similar threads












































Latest Threads

Top