SCOG replacements (ref: HMS Tireless) cost £3.6 million

#3
The really sad point is the cursory way in which the £3.6m has been accounted for. "Constructive Losses" all neat and tidy, just what the auditors would like.
Nothing will reflect the sheer incompetence of used/returned stock being returned fit for service onto front line boats, imperiling the lives of submariners. Their equipment should be fail safe and no margin left for error... Logical Logistics!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Submariners 1

Similar threads

Latest Threads

New Posts

Top