kingoftwigs said:He'll get fcuked, then again, if he did he deserves all he gets.
Lamri said:Agreed, there must've been more to this than meets the eye (in my humble opinion) though :neutral:
rosinacarley said:Whilst not commenting on this particular case may I remind you all of a few things
1. The standard of proof in criminal matters is beyond reasonable doubt.
2. The Court in Court Martials/jury in civvy trials is unlikely to convict unless they are very sure. You can see that this is an issue because the govt are trying to reduce the ability to have a trial by jury. The govt does not like juries precisely because they do not convict.
3. Leave it at that, because you have not heard the proceedings, and therefore your only information is from the media which delights in distorting matters.