no it did not........ altho he messes about in that thread he does add normaly to other threads...and uses the chat room like many others do.
i have not personaly read his very own thread,,, well i tried too but got fed up with the inane drivel and fell asleep... there are as many that get on it with him as those that dont...
Personally, I see no need for it to be shown here mate, we all, to a man, support the brave Gurkhas. However, on the other side of the coin, you are very right to be proudly showing it (if you know what I mean ) but it would be nice if you could shrink it a bit mate, just so that more posts were shown per page, if nothing else!
I agree with Higs and JD, who .. er .. appear to agree with each other too; that can't be right :shakefist: Anyway, between the two of them they have summed up my thoughts on this issue, exactly. :thumright:
Quite right, Janner. As Higs and JD say, if you don't like 'oxygen thieves' don't engage with them. Those who would ban people at the same time as they engage with them are in a bit of a quandry because in the very act of replying (and replying repeatedly) to the posts of someone they would otherwise wish to banish they both elevate that persons post to one worthy of reply and legitimise that person's right to express their viewpoints, regardless of whether one finds those views palatable or not. And if that kind of philosophical argument does not convice you then you could simply say to yourself, 'let him have his say but I'll not give him the satisfaction of a response' - what is he going to do then?