Navy Net - Royal Navy Community

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarines?

Dicky

Lantern Swinger
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

Soleil: The toilet fittings will have to be changed. They are fitting a device which just 'cups' the lady's bits and she can do it stood up like the blokes do. For more details go to: [email protected] - forward slash - etc...lol
 

Dicky

Lantern Swinger
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

Soleil: Are you trying to stir the shit mate ? A sea cadet officer is wanting to change the way the most silent of the silent service runs it's affairs ? I trust the said Mr Creighton is an ex-submariner and speaks from experience of boats, if not he'd be better off shutting his gob and carry on drilling schoolkids around a parade ground at Whale Island....f.....g puff !
 

soleil

War Hero
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

Certainly wasn't my intention, Dicky.

I chose it for the submariner forum because it was quite a long and detailed article, represented a variety of opinions (although not necessarily informed ones) and was on a topic which is of current interest.
 

R12_CV

Lantern Swinger
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

Dicky said:
A sea cadet officer is wanting to change the way the most silent of the silent service runs it's affairs ? I trust the said Mr Creighton is an ex-submariner and speaks from experience of boats, if not he'd be better off shutting his gob and carry on drilling schoolkids around a parade ground at Whale Island....f.....g puff !

I agree, yet another embarrassing Sea Cadet Officer waving the pc flag (regardless of his background)
 

Guns

War Hero
Moderator
Right.

Under current employment law we, MoD, have to review any employment restrictions we have in place due to Gender. These reviews are conducted to determine the Operational Effect of a particular decision.

Within the military we regulalry review decisions (think Estimate and the "What has Changed" question).

So we are reviewing women serving on submarines. Does this mean next month 100's of women will be serving at sea? No. Does it mean we will look at and decided upon the Operational Effect of women serving in Submarines? Yes.

The outcome will then determine policy. And then be reviewed again after a period of time.

So lets park the Outrage Bus, return the keys to MT and let those that are paid to review such things to do their job and report back. It is not the end of time nor will the four horseman ride over the hills.
 

R12_CV

Lantern Swinger
Guns said:
So lets park the Outrage Bus, return the keys to MT and let those that are paid to review such things to do their job and report back. It is not the end of time nor will the four horseman ride over the hills.

*?*

Sorry soleil, seems we cannot discuss this issue..!

(***feeling calm***) sigh
 

Guns

War Hero
Moderator
Feel free to discuss it, maybe those invoved in the decision making process read this site and will take onboard comments, but some of the previous threads on this subject have been crayoned to death.

Sensible comments, great and a real debate always appriciated. Outrage at the possibility that time will end because, possibly, women might serve on boats is just dull.

My view, don't have one as I am a skimmer and don't really care. But would be interesting in Submariners comments, if there would be an affect on operational capability - not outdated sexist views. Not aimed at anyone just a comment based on previous Outrage comments from previous threads.
 

soleil

War Hero
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

I have to say that this is the first article I've seen on this subject which mentions the potential technical difficulties on boats of feminine hygiene requirements. Would this really be problematic?
 

lonestar

War Hero
R12_CV said:
Guns said:
So lets park the Outrage Bus, return the keys to MT and let those that are paid to review such things to do their job and report back. It is not the end of time nor will the four horseman ride over the hills.

*?*

Sorry soleil, seems we cannot discuss this issue..!

(***feeling calm***) sigh

There was no discussion in the initial replies, there was just pointless huffing and puffing without substance. Guns is right, the numerous previous threads on women in submarines have descended into a lot of people basically saying, it's a man's world, it didn't used to happen like this, submariners wives won't like it! Those are pointless arguments because they will not be taken into account in the eventual decision making process.

This article is in fact a perfect example of this approach. It's sources include a Sea Cadet instructor, an ex-submariner from a veterans group, the mayor who bases her opinions on the 'oh its not very nice down there is it' theory, a guy who used to have a submarine connection who now has a daughter in the sea cadets and a woman from some business association who has far as we can tell has no Naval connection whatsoever. This is ropey, amateurish, local journalism which trivialises the issue and really fails to engage it any substantive level.
 

R12_CV

Lantern Swinger
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

soleil said:
I have to say that this is the first article I've seen on this subject which mentions the potential technical difficulties on boats of feminine hygiene requirements. Would this really be problematic?

I cannot see any reason why women would have a hygiene problem in deeps. Regarding the issue of women's products (or at least the disposal of) there is the eco friendly alternative called the Mooncup.
I'm sure many women on here have heard of and used this device.

I'm sure that hairspray would annoy the odd cox'n though!
 

FunkyJunky

War Hero
for me...there are day to day issues..such as disposal of sanitry towells etc...seem trivial but how many times on operational patrol are the showers etc out of use..is this OK with women during their "cycle"..will they be happy to wash their bits in the sink during that time of the month..?

what if all the heads (on a T boat) in the JRs and SRs bathrooms are down..or a macerator shortage (it has happened plenty of times) and the ONLY head is the wardroom...and that say gets blocked with a sanitry towell..?

then you have the issue on a deterent patrol..you could imagine the press having an absolute field day if a patrol was cut short due to a female sailor getting up t he duff at sea..and/or there is a complication..what if a female sailor loses an unborn at sea..? could that be dealt with sufficiently without breaking the patrol

what IF she was an afty and and the baby she will one day have, get complications due to being exposed to radiation...that would be disasterous for the RN.....unthinkable damage will be done etc

also, lets be honest, just serving that close together will not work..I have been on a ship and many of them are sleeping with each other at sea at an alarming rate..please dont anyone tell me that is not true as you will show yourself up as being completely out of touch...one ship my mate is on has a "shag room" to be used when at sea...

and all the problems that go with the tensions that brings at sea and ashore..

one thing that makes (imo) the submarine service much more of an elite is there is not posturing in the mess, we are all in it together lads dont give a shit if they go for a week without a shower as there is no one to impress....and there is simply no "urge" to get yourself into a pickle..

anyone who has spent weeks/months on patrol (hopefully) will get my gist
 

fishhead

War Hero
Guns said:
Feel free to discuss it, maybe those invoved in the decision making process read this site and will take onboard comments,
My bold
So there you have it,feel free to discuss it but don't take it for granted that anyone will take any notice of the things that they do not like.You get the impression that the decision is a good as taken and things will press ahead regardless of the clear problems(and cost) involved.Many of those who have actually seen service in submarines can see problems that have not arisen with all male crews and it is only natural that they all should be given the chance to comment.This should take place both in the Lower Deck as well as the Wardroom and all opinion should carry equal weight.Many of those who voice an anti opinion are howled down as being misogynists and being out of step with modern times to discredit their opinions but perhaps they have a point which should not be ignored.
 

Guns

War Hero
Moderator
Err as in maybe they read this site. Maybe they don't. I don't know.

All I asked for was less of the "par women, they'll cry" and some proper debate. Just as FunkyJunky has done, with comments about unborn children and the affects of radiation. My opinion, the medical reasons will be the same and will not have changed from before and that will decided the issue.
 

FunkyJunky

War Hero
I will also add that those saying "well, it is the 21st century and women should be able to serve on them"..

That is all well and good in making sound bites etc..but in reality things are very different..
the OC of a sub IS everything...that drops, people could (and have) die...simple as that..that is not being dramatic that is a fact...

would women being allowed to serve on the current crop of submarines have a negative effect on the OC (S, T, A and V class)...It can only be a big yes.....

I just hope for the sake of the service that the powers at be dont use this decision to be seen to be doing what the wider public may think is right..I hope they say NO for the time being...
 

snorko

Lantern Swinger
good points raised by funky junky.

to delve a bit deeper:

Messing - the messes on A class are:

1 big JRs mess fwd.
2 SRs Messes 16 and 24 ish
Wardroom comprising:
XO/WEO
MEO/DMEO
8 berth

There is also a riders grot - yup - 9 pits.

SR/JR Heads and bathrooms are all off 2dk passageway - and not a lot of space
WR HEads and showers next to WR accom.

So: The current BAE assumption is that accommodation would be mixed messing - yup. I do not believe that we are "enlightened" enough yet for that to work. The same assumption is also being used for Future Deterrent. There would be no separate Female Heads/Showers - only about 5 showers on board as it is!!!


San Towels. Cannot go in the heads as the macerator units would break. Therefore need a san towel bin. However there is no gash gun anymore so they would need to be compacted - yup - and then stored with the rest of the gash - that is one job you would not get me doing in the garbo - bodily fluids in the garbo - no thanks. So how do we deal with period products - no idea but answers on a postcard appreciated.

So I can see the following issues issues: Messing and "female products", showers, as well as pregnancy/radiotion/patrol breaking.

I can see it happening, but there are serious issues that need addressing.
 

FunkyJunky

War Hero
if the MOD/Labour/whoever had any real common sense for the sake of the Submarine service and not in spite of it for political correctness, they would say NO this time but MAYBE say that the SUCCESSOR project will ensure that females are catered for on the replacement for Vanguard...maybe by then, radiation issue and all those mentioned above are researched and dealt with properly
 

lonestar

War Hero
Re: NW Mail: Will women be employed on Barrow built submarin

It seems that defence chiefs were offered a choice of two options. 2 studies were undertaken at the same time, as they periodically are, one was into women in the infantry (and other front line combat roles) and the other was into women on submarines. Both came back as being possible and defence chiefs had to make a choice to appease the government who were not willing to disregard both, changing submarine policy is seen as less disruptive than the other option and thus this option is likely to be agreed to. Hence the significant ramping up of speculation just recently.

There was a newspaper article which outlined this posted here recently but I can't find it.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
sgtpepperband Daily Mail: "Five women to become first female Marines" The Corps 28
MoD_RSS Royal Mail to collect COVID-19 test kits 7 days a week MoD News 0
soleil Daily Mail: "Proud Dad Gordon Ramsay Reveals Son Jack, 20, Has Joined The Royal Marines" The Corps 5
soleil NWE Mail: "Barrow Built Submarine Becomes Inaugural Winner Of A New Royal Navy Commendation" Submariners 2
F Not receiving activation E-mail for candidate portal Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 10
MoD_RSS Prime Minister's article in the Mail on Sunday: 17 May 2020 MoD News 0
soleil NWE Mail: "Submariner Memorial Appeal - Competition To Celebrate The RN Launched By BAE In Barrow" Submariners 7
soleil Mail: RM Found Face Down In Freezing Water During Beach Assault Exercise - Update The Corps 6
soleil Mail: "RM Chiefs Spark Fury By Offering £10,000 'Golden Hello' Payments To Former Commandos To Rejoin" The Corps 15
soleil Mail: HMS Defender Seizes £3.3m Haul Of Crystal Meth From Drug Smuggler's Dhow In The Arabian Sea The Fleet 3
soleil Mail: "Divers Uncover Guns, A Mop And Even Bottles Of Booze From British Warship HMS Invincible" History 10
soleil Mail: "Real-Life 'Rocket Man' Wearing A Jet Pack Launches From ... HMS Queen Elizabeth" The Fleet 8
MoD_RSS News story: Civil news: contacting the exceptional and complex cases team by e-mail MoD News 0
guns1969 Un-solicited Mail Diamond Lil's 10
soleil Mail: "First Of RAF’s £9 Billion Stealth Fighter Fleet To Land On HMS Queen Elizabeth During Trump Visit In July" The Fleet Air Arm 3
soleil D. Mail: "Royal Marines Stage Dramatic Landing On Scottish Shore" The Corps 1
soleil NW Evening Mail: "Watch A Video Of The Wreck Of The Barrow-Built Sub Holland 5" Submariners 0
soleil Mail: Royal Navy Keeps Old Offshore Patrol Ships It Was Due To Retire For Post-Brexit Coastline Protection The Fleet 1
soleil Mail: "CDS Threatens To Block Promotions Unless Officers Improve The 'Inclusivity And Diversity' Of Their Units" Current Affairs 24
MoD_RSS Speech: Defence Secretary Op-Ed for the Mail on Sunday on mental health MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Speech: Defence Secretary Op-Ed for the Mail on Sunday on mental health MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: Improved mail service ensures loved ones can stay in touch MoD News 0
photface DGW Mail Royal Naval Reserve (RNR) 3
MoD_RSS News story: MOD and Royal Mail sign new agreement to keep personnel connected MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: MOD extends its free mail service for Defence Personnel MoD News 0
G Daily Mail caught lying again. How long can they get away with it? Current Affairs 31
MoD_RSS News story: Royal Mail pledges support for Armed Forces Covenant MoD News 0
wave_dodger Daily Mail does it again Current Affairs 103
S Daily Mail - redundancy mess up. Current Affairs 11
soleil NW Evening Mail: Falklands Veteran Sub Leaves Barrow And Embarks On Her Final Voyage Submariners 3
soleil Mail: "The Return Of Britain's 'Top Guns': Royal Navy Recommissions Training Squadron The Fleet Air Arm 11
soleil Mail: "Britain's 'Invisible' Stealth Fighter That Has Cost The Taxpayer £1.3 billion" The Gash Barge 10
soleil Mail: "Antiques Roadshow Object Solves 40-year Puzzle Of How 280ft RN Submarine Sank" Submariners 9
sgtpepperband Daily Mail Wail Fail Current Affairs 15
soleil Mail: "Enemies Beware: Royal Navy Shows Off Its Latest Radar System" The Fleet 8
soleil Mail: "Battle Of The River Plate Monument To Be Unveiled Today" History 10
soleil Mail: "Navy's Gibraltar Stand-off With Spanish Patrol: Warship Challenges 3 Ships" Bases / Shore Est 0
soleil NW Evening Mail: "Huge Piece Of Submarine Dwarfs Barrow Road" Submariners 0
soleil Mail: "BehinD The Scenes With The British Pilots Learning To Fly F-35 Fighter Jet" The Fleet Air Arm 5
soleil Mail: 'RN Veteran Finally Receives His Medals, 64 Years After They Were Lost In Post' History 3
soleil Mail: "Sweetheart Letters On Display For First Time As Part of New RN Exhibition" History 9
soleil Mail: "Were 30 Royal Marines Poisoned By Gas On Derelict Soviet Weapons Plant?" The Corps 5
soleil Mail: 'History In Black And White: WWI Vessels To Be Repainted In 'Dazzle Camouflage' History 1
soleil Mail: "One For Hovering Buyers: Harrier Jump Jet For Sale" The Fleet Air Arm 3
soleil Mail: "A Real Maverick! Norwegian F16 Fighter Pilot Poses For A Selfie" The Fleet Air Arm 6
soleil Mail: "The Maternity Military: How Nearly 100 Female Soldiers Have Been Sent Home" Current Affairs 14
soleil Mail: "Sea Of Love: Royal Navy Crew Spell Out Valentine's Message On The Deck" The Fleet 4
soleil Mail: "Royal Navy Seizes 1.25 Tonnes Of Cocaine Worth £60 million From Speedboat" RFA 2
soleil BBC: "Mail Rail - What Is It Like On The 'Secret' Tube?" History 0
soleil Mail: "Silent Cities Of Sacrifice: Battlefields Where You Can Mark 100 Yrs Since WW1" History 4
Similar threads


















































Latest Threads

Top