Missthedits you are of course totally correct, and should stand by your family motto of Fcukemallus Regulas.
The blagging and lies of the posters in this thread as to the quality of there previous partners is outrageous.
They either were in the Navy, or they were fussy finicky tossers.
There is no such thing under Naval Regulations either in Q.R. DCI's or AFO's as a bad shag.
Each of course has it's merits, scored on a scale of 1 to 100.
Seldom do the members of HM. ships ever attain a score rated shag much above 70, I being the highest attainable.
When they reach (if ever) a shag rated above 60 they start to consider marriage, and if exceed 40, they actually do it.
Most matelots will however claim a 10+ but once they have sobered up for a year or two soon realise that is was a mistake and the 50/40 rated are much prettier especially at weekends and after 10/15 pints.
Back in the early 70s.. camped next to a deaf Canadian couple.. they were in a tent, she was a "screamer".. They didn't know it, but we did.. I would have told him 'ceptin they stole my campsite picnic table..
(it was at Yogi Bear Park, on Boo Boo Blvd, next to Disney World.. all paved over with 15 story hotels now)
And don't be so upity.. after four weeks at sea she would be a babe.. after six weeks, either would be a catch..