No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Crisis

Discussion in 'History' started by LancashireHussar, Apr 3, 2006.

Welcome to the Navy Net aka Rum Ration

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial RN website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Interesting reading.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...uba03.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/03/ixhome.html

    No 10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban nuclear missile crisis
    By Ben Fenton
    (Filed: 03/04/2006)

    Downing Street was shocked to learn in 1962 that its American allies had been poised to start World War III over the Cuban missile crisis without consulting Britain, new papers reveal.


    So important did the prime minister, Harold Macmillan, consider a report from his intelligence chief in the days after President John F Kennedy faced down a Soviet nuclear threat in his backyard that he immediately sent a copy to the Queen.

    The warning from Maj Gen Sir Kenneth Strong, the director of the Joint Intelligence Bureau, on Nov 19 struck particularly hard because it was delivered before the real end of the crisis.

    Unknown to No 10, three days earlier the US navy had conducted an exercise in North Carolina that was a dry run for an invasion of Cuba because its communist leader, Fidel Castro, was showing signs of reneging on the deal to remove the missiles and Ilyushin IL28 bombers that had pulled the world back from the brink.

    Sir Kenneth, who had been Gen Dwight D Eisenhower's intelligence chief at the time of D-Day, had received detailed briefings on how the Kennedy administration was handling the crisis, probably from his friend John Alex McCone, the director of the CIA.

    The papers, released last week at the National Archives in Kew, show that the retired general told Mr Macmillan and Earl Home, the foreign secretary, just how serious the situation had become in the full heat of the crisis.

    A "note for the record" of the meeting reports his saying that President Kennedy "had concluded" before deciding to blockade shipping to Cuba that it would mean a likely Soviet attack on West Berlin.

    "The Americans were prepared to go it alone, either without consulting their allies or irrespective of what their allies said, had the Russians reacted against any action in Cuba by moving against Berlin," the note reads.

    "Gen Strong thought the American government were prepared for their action in Cuba to escalate into the nuclear. It seemed to him that the US administration were over-confident that they had pinpointed the position of all the main sites of inter-continental ballistic missiles in the Soviet Union and they hoped they would be able to take these out with a pre-emptive attack by their bombers."

    Mr Macmillan and Lord Home were horrified that their allies, who had appeared to consult them from the early stages of the crisis, were only paying lip-service to the idea.

    They worried that America was dangerously gung-ho about fighting a nuclear war, which the Pentagon assumed it could win.

    The crisis had begun in late September 1962 when the CIA learned that Soviet technicians were installing nuclear missiles on the northern coast of Cuba.

    U2 spy plane flights over the island in October confirmed the presence of the missiles and on the 22nd of that month, as behind-the-scenes threats and demands were exchanged by Washington and Moscow, President Kennedy went on television to reveal that the world was on the brink of war. Nobody doubted that it would be a nuclear conflict.

    After six days of stand-off as US navy vessels blockaded Cuba, the Soviet leader, Nikita Khruschev, agreed to dismantle and remove the missiles and bombers in exchange for a secret American disarmament in Turkey.

    The blockade continued, with the constant risk of renewed conflict, until Nov 20, the day after Mr Macmillan's meeting with Gen Strong.

    Len Scott, professor of international politics at the University of Wales Aberystwyth and the author of Macmillan, Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis, said yesterday: "The papers show how worried the British were about how the Americans reacted to the crisis and it is certainly the first time we knew this."
     
  2. Re: No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Cr

    You a Jouno Lancashire, keep picking out these News tip bits to get quotes from the Military scene????????? Do you have no opinions of your own?

    Nutty
     
  3. Re: No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Cr

    No, certainly not a Journo Nutty, actually a Pongo, which you may find worse! :lol: Just thought that the above stories were relevant and interesting and deserved a wider readership. Problem?
     
  4. Re: No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Cr

    Lanc's

    As on Current Affairs. May the Force be with you

    Nutty
     
  5. Re: No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Cr

    No problems mate, I dislike journos sniffing journos as much as you do, if you're ever Down Under look me up and we'll have a beer.

    Regards
    LH.
     
  6. janner

    janner War Hero Book Reviewer

    Re: No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Cr

    I was more than a little horrified myself, we met the Yank fleet coming the other way off Cuba in 1962, they looked very Gung Ho and there were lots of them
     
  7. Re: No10 horrified by gung-ho US in Cuban Nuclear Missile Cr

    I've never understood the generally held line that the Cuban Missile Crisis was all the Soviets fault.

    in reality it was the last gasp of the US nuclear domination, when they held a vast range of nuclear weapons capable of hitting the USSR whilst the Soviets had relatively few weapons capable of hitting the continental USA. The Soviets had seen the US base IRBMs in Turkey and Italy (and arguably the UK as the RAF Thors) and thought doing the equivalent by basing ones in Cuba a good idea. Somehow the US didn't think this was playing the game and decided to break the international law of the freedom of the seas.

    My, how things change !

    (Of course the generally held view that the US "won" has been thouroughly de-bunked with the old revelation that there was a side agreement over the removal of the Turkish/Italian IRBMs, but it was all rather sillly as the age of the ICBM had already dawned).
     

Share This Page