Navy Net - Royal Navy Community

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Navy's new "Pointless Frigates"


Book Reviewer
A colleague pointed this out to me Lewis Page writes yet more drivel, its pretty amazing that someone can write such ill-informed, opinionated rubbish and still expect to be regarded as a serious journalist!

I love the picture of the T23 with a "30mm for DHOWS", he managed to count the Harpoons but clearly became confused with the VLS Seawolf's :lol:

And then our expert spouts "Rather, its (a frigate) main job - if it can really be said to have one - is hunting submarines. However, this is actually done almost entirely by the frigate's helicopter*. Anti-submarine helicopters can be (and often are) operated at sea in larger numbers and much more cheaply aboard fleet-auxiliary vessels, so it's hard to see why you would bother buying expensive frigates for this purpose".

Now there it is, the experience of his PWO training and extensive time on DD/FFs. We hunt sub surface contacts entirely by HELO, never use the Towed Array Sonar, or the Hull Mounted Sonar (or other, CESM, SIGINT assets) therefore we can use RFAs and get rid of frigates entirely. :eek:

Then our illustrious educator has a crack at Harpoon "But eight Harpoons isn't an amount of punch you would need a several-thousand-ton ship with a crew in three figures to carry. Eight Harpoons would call for a fast-attack boat, or a corvette at best. And frankly, given that you're going to need aircraft to find or confirm the far-away targets to begin with, it makes more sense to deliver the munitions by air as well. Carrier jets are a much more sensible option here than frigates: helicopters can also carry powerful air-to-surface weapons."

I think there are more, and better, ways of identifying OTH targets than that these days. Smacks of a lack of currency and even imagination!

And displaying signs of utter fantasy: "In general, in a hypothetical battle between a Type 26 combat ship and an unarmed enemy merchant ship carrying several helicopters to the 26's single one, the merchant ship will probably win as it can keep aircraft flying round the clock. The merchant ship can also do a better job at hunting subs, for the same reason."

So, as the Frigates zipps around at XX knots, slapping Harpoon at the unarmed merchant ship before it can get its helo's airborne; or while its busy engagiong them with Seawolf!! I'd rather be on the has Mr Page even considered the personnel required to support, operate and maintain several armed helicopters from a ship - ah that would be OCEAN!

More deluded rambling, "A frequent justification for frigates and destroyers is that you need them to protect carriers, but the fact of the matter is that carriers can protect themselves on their own far better than the escort ships can."

So, a carrier with a limited AA capability, no towed array of its own- doesn't need escorts? So the entire US Carrier Battlegroup concept is wrong, Lewis has said so!

The final ramblings are interested; “Type 26 is a key component in sustaining a surface warship capability in UK industry," says BAE's surface-warship chief Alan Johnston", Or in other words we need to have some frigates so as to avoid closing our frigate yards, so that we will be able to have even more frigates in future. Tail wags dog: ice-cream licks itself"

In this Page may have had a credible argument but I don't agree with his stance. At the height of WW2 we were churning out a submarine every 4 weeks, surface ships of varying types in generally 4-6 weeks. These days ships (and aircraft) are so incredibly complex they take years to design and build even if you ignore the MoD contractual snags. Do we or don't we want an organic UK industrial capacity? I suggests its in our national interests to ensure we do, yet Mr Page clearly isn't so sure.


He's a clown. Not for the first time he has made himself look a tit to anyone with even a basic understanding of Naval Warfare and RN capability.

He also writes like an 11 year old.


Lantern Swinger
Montigny-La-Palisse said:
He's a clown. Not for the first time he has made himself look a tit to anyone with even a basic understanding of Naval Warfare and RN capability.

He also writes like an 11 year old.
His CV is somewhat worrying... said:
Armed Forces Career:

University Air Squadron, RAF 1988-91

Royal Navy officer 1993-2004

* Navigator, HMS Quorn 1994-96
* Long Mine Clearance Diving Officer course 1996-97
* Ops Officer, HMS Middleton 1997-98
* All-arms Commando course 1997
* Executive Officer, HMS Bridport 1998-01
* Officer in Charge, Southern Diving Unit One 2001-04
* Joint Improvised Explosive Device Disposal No. 1 Operator course 2001


Cambridge University (Engineering degree 1988-91, St John's College)
Islington Green Comprehensive


War Hero
Must. Not. Swear.........F":*ing C&*K

I really would like to meet him and discuss his ramblings. He has no idea of current maritime operations, is limited in his Naval experience and I suspect some PWO off a FF/DD did his misuses when he was at sea. It can be the only reason I can think of.


War Hero
I had the misfortune to train this feckin cretin on his LMCDO's course, his Daddy was something big in the Telegraph, can't remember what, but this cnut was a typical silver spooned feckin hurah.

I tried to have him removed from training but was over-ruled, I took solace in the fact that I personally would never have to serve any where near the twat.

I can't be arsed to explain just how big a cnut this twat is.


Lantern Swinger
hmmm a few more threads with carefully chosen keywords and we might get the Rum Ration threads about Mr Page to appear first in search engine rankings....

Not a problem W_D, interesting to see reactions from people who missed the first thread ;)


Lantern Swinger
I can see what FF/DD stand for, but why FF and DD? Why not just F and D?

Bone questions R us...
Toucan said:
I can see what FF/DD stand for, but why FF and DD? Why not just F and D?

Bone questions R us...

As with many things, we and NATO have followed US Navy policy:

USN Ship Designations said:
Nomenclature History

Warships in the United States Navy were first designated and numbered in system originating in 1895. Under this system, ships were designated as "Battleship X", "Cruiser X", "Destroyer X", "Torpedo Boat X" and so forth where X was the series hull number as authorized by the US Congress. These designations were usually abbreviated as "B-1", "C-1", "D-1", "TB-1," etc. This system became cumbersome by 1920, as many new ship types had been developed during World War I that needed new categories assigned, especially in the Auxiliary ship area. On 17 July 1920, the designation system was revised so that all ships were now designated with a two letter code and a hull number, with the first letter being the ship type and the second letter being the sub-type. For example, the destroyer tender USS Melville, first commissioned as "Destroyer Tender No. 2" in 1915, was now re-designated as "AD-2" with the "A" standing for Auxiliary, the "D" for Destroyer (Tender) and the "2" meaning the second ship in that series. Ship types that did not have a subclassification simply repeated the first letter. So, Battleships became "BB-X" and Destroyers became "DD-X" with X being the same number as previously assigned. Ships that changed classifications were given new hull numbers within their new designation series...
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MoD_RSS World-class autonomous minehunters to protect Royal Navy MoD News 1
AccessHeritage Royal Navy's Use of The Infernal Machine History 19
MoD_RSS Royal Navy warship sails into Arctic Circle for High North operation MoD News 0
MoD_RSS UK Royal Navy concludes first joint exercises with Egypt MoD News 0
N royal navy medical appeal alcohol Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 4
higthepig Navy news October 2020 The Quarterdeck 0
mikh Navy Net asks for your consent to use your personal data to: Bloody Computers 9
MoD_RSS Royal Navy seizes over 450kg in the largest methamphetamine drug bust in the Middle East MoD News 0
soleil FB: National Museum Of The Royal Navy: 215th Anniversary Of The Battle Of Trafalgar History 2
soleil FB: Royal Navy And Royal Marines Charity - Hosting Your Own Trafalgar Night/Pickle Night Dinner History 2
soleil Express: "Submarine Sparks Panic In Scotland As Onlookers Mistake Royal Navy Exercise For Fire" Submariners 2
sampost Jubilee Sailing Trust announces pioneering collaboration with the Royal Navy Sports and Adventure Training 2
soleil Royal Navy Recipients In The Queen's Birthday Honours List 2020 Current Affairs 2
soleil FB: Royal Navy And Royal Marines Charity: World Uckers Championship 2020 The Fleet 1
soleil The Times: "Life On The Ocean Wave: The Royal Navy Photographic Awards" The Fleet 1
soleil BBC: "HMS Queen Elizabeth: On board The Royal Navy's New Aircraft Carrier" The Fleet 0
MoD_RSS Royal Navy seize £160 million worth of drugs in the Caribbean MoD News 1
higthepig Navy news September 2020 The Quarterdeck 0
soleil NWE Mail: "Barrow Built Submarine Becomes Inaugural Winner Of A New Royal Navy Commendation" Submariners 2
soleil New Badge For Trainee Royal Navy Submariners Submariners 18
M Royal Navy interviews Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 1
D Royal Navy Handymen The Fleet 21
B how to find service number royal navy Site Issues 7
soleil P. News: "Royal Navy's HMS Sultan Forced To Cancel Popular Fireworks Due To Covid-19" Bases / Shore Est 4
H Royal Navy Push up standards Joining the Royal Navy 5
J Navy or RAF Royal Naval Reserve (RNR) 8
soleil FB: NAVYFit - Squash - 1SL v The Chief Of The Australian Navy Sports and Adventure Training 1
higthepig Navy news August 2020 The Quarterdeck 0
S Transfer from Army to Navy Joining the Royal Navy 13
D Both parents in the Royal Navy Joining the Royal Navy 1
soleil FB: National Museum Of The Royal Navy - On This Day - Sir Thomas Sean Connery Was Born History 3
MoD_RSS DIO completes state-of-the-art gym for Royal Navy MoD News 0
MoD_RSS UK launches multinational training to enhance Ukrainian Navy against threats from the East MoD News 0
soleil Somerset Live: Royal Navy 'Legend' Still Flying After 50 Years And 9,200 Hours In The Air The Fleet Air Arm 2
soleil FB: Navy Wings: 'The Wrong Sort Of Air' ……......…..... The Fleet Air Arm 3
soleil Dorset Echo: "‘Does Anyone Know My Old Navy Friend?" The Quarterdeck 4
T Navy Entry Date Marine Engineer Joining the Royal Navy 4
T Application process-Royal Navy Joining the Royal Navy 8
T Fitness Test Royal Navy Joining the Royal Navy 15
T Commissioning from army to navy (hopefully) UPO/Careers Office 24
D Navy CBAT/FATs Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 2
soleil FB: Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity - Black Tot Day - 50th Anniversary History 11
soleil FB: Navy Wings - Aircrew Logbooks The Fleet Air Arm 2
MoD_RSS Glen Mallan jetty refurbishment to support Royal Navy’s surface fleets MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Stena Superfast VII and Royal Navy submarine report published MoD News 0
J Navy to raf apprenticeship Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 8
soleil Royal Navy International Air Day - Online - Saturday, July 11th 2020 The Fleet Air Arm 2
N Royal Navy Drugs Policy Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 36
T What is the contract of service for the royal navy rating? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 1
higthepig Navy news June 2020 The Quarterdeck 3
Similar threads

Latest Threads