Sorry, why should being guilty as charged make it OK to positively identify a Serviceman who stuffed up doing his job. He's now been sentenced twice; once correctly by the judicial system and again by any passing fatwa. For Abdul the Dull, it could now be open season on Sgt A's family. I hope I'm wrong but I personally wouldn't want to take the risk. Still, it's not the bloody judge's neck, is it.
We ask blokes to do beastly things for us in some of the words mankiest shiteholes and, occasionally, one of them stuffs up. Military and Civil Law, quite rightly, deals with that. I do believe, though, that we still owe a duty not to place a Serviceman who, for whatever reason, has stuffed up in unecessary danger on completion of his sentence. If the wily oriental gentlemen are happy to saw off the head of a Bandsman who's probably never harmed anyone, how secure's a bloke who's publicly slotted one of their "brothers"?
To the High Court Judge who's closest call to danger's probably been fog on the M4, Well done; support your local Serviceman.