Loss of Bounty

itsamuppet

Lantern Swinger
Can anyone please tell me when it was officially announced in writing that if you didn't pass the RNFT you would lose 20% of your bounty this year. It was one of those rumours spread around but I have not seen any official announcement and only to my knowledge in the later part of 2006.

Surely this could be considered a fine for being unfit and only against the RNR as the RN are given extra PT and counselling if they are unfit certainly no stoppage of pay or leave as a punishment.

I know we sign a contract every 5 years but it seems that the RNR is free to change the conditions of this at will without giving any notice. I also know that this is necessary to remain flexible to meet the needs of the RN but things like this seem only to get up peoples backs and make them leave.

And before you ask I've passed mine so this doesn't effect me
 

TF110

Lantern Swinger
It was never officially announced. Instead it seems to have slipped in through the back door. If you search the back of this forum then Master Chief assured us that there was no intent to give a 20% cut to bounty this year. To bring this in with 2 weeks notice is a total disgrace. I am all for the RNRFT, I am all for people being fit for duty - but I am all for CMR to actually talk to its people and let us know whats going on rather than try to assume we can read their minds.

I know a lot of committed dedicated people who have said that this is the straw that is breaking their back. I fully expect people to leave as a result of this and I fully expect CMR to carry on in their insultated ivory tower.
 

RNRAWBOD

Badgeman
Agree there could have been a better communication/lead time to this.

But at the same time the bounty has always been conditional on meeting your annual training requirement.

As of fairly recently, and following lessons learned from mobilisations over the past few years where fitness has been indentified as an issue, the RNFT is (coming in on a phased/age basis) part of this training commitment for the RNR.

It therefore could be justified in refusing 100% of bounty if you fail, really, although that would not be good people management IMHO!

And incidentally - the 20% cut is if you do not ATTEMPT the RNFT by the end of the training year. It is not, at present, necessary actually to pass it. And it incidentally only applies those under 30. Damn...I'm 35... :)

Still personally going to do it to the same timescales as a matter of principle though.
 
The RNRFT is embarrassingly easy and I was under the impression I would get no bounty if I was not in date. Just goes to show what variable communications is doing the rounds though!
 
TF110 said:
It was never officially announced. Instead it seems to have slipped in through the back door. If you search the back of this forum then Master Chief assured us that there was no intent to give a 20% cut to bounty this year. To bring this in with 2 weeks notice is a total disgrace. I am all for the RNRFT, I am all for people being fit for duty - but I am all for CMR to actually talk to its people and let us know whats going on rather than try to assume we can read their minds.

I know a lot of committed dedicated people who have said that this is the straw that is breaking their back. I fully expect people to leave as a result of this and I fully expect CMR to carry on in their insultated ivory tower.
I see the RNR does not intend to apply for Investors in People Accreditation, for it would fail under the new standard because of piss poor communication!
 

FlagWagger

GCM
Book Reviewer
Always_a_Civvy said:
I see the RNR does not intend to apply for Investors in People Accreditation, for it would fail under the new standard because of piss poor communication!
The RNR is already IIP accredited I believe (or at least it was)! I had a perfect example of how much regard IIP was held by the RTCs. On joining a unit, IIP required all new joiners to have a meeting with the CO within a relatively short period (4 weeks I think). As a new joiner following my joining routine, I duly made an appointment and turned up on time (i.e. five minutes early) for the meeting; at the time of the meeting I was ushered in to the COs cabin, invited to sit down, and proceeded to have a nice informal chat with the CO. After five minutes of chit-chat, the CO casually inquired as to the purpose of the meeting (it had been down in the diary) and when I told her she looked surprised - her comment summed up my experience of IIP - "I didn't know that was meant to happen"!

On the subject of bounty and RNFT - I have no problem with bounty eleigibility being linked to the Fitness Test; the introduction of the test has however, been less than clear with a confusing profusion of dates dependent upon age and rate menaing that this year some people require the FT while other (generally the elderly) don't. Linking bounty into such a confused environment is a recipe of mistakes - what more did we expect?
 

trehorn

War Hero
First i knew was on an email a couple of weeks ago which i was asked to send around to everyone.

The requirement is to "attempt" the fitness test, in which case two feet over the starting line counts. Which leaves me to wonder what is the point.

I passed with flying colours despite having only 8 hours notice of the test.

We have also heard a rumour (yes another one!!!) that bounty may be reduced if you fail to undertake at least one recruitment activity per year.

I agree that the FT is important but if you're going to do it, give people notice and dont phrase it as loosely as "attempt" the fitness test.

I also agree that everyone should play an active role in recruiting but again it does seem that these new requirements are being introduced in a rather sneeky manner.
 

Uncle_Albert

War Hero
Indeed they can; nonetheless, ten days warning seems a bit tight. I checked in my unit once I'd got the eMail, and true to memory, there was a notice on the wall saying that anyone of my rate and age had until the end of May to take the fitness test. Not a thing about taking it this bounty year.

It's the kind of contradictory clusterfuck I've come to expect over the last six months. Ten ******* days notice for a bounty requirement. Genius, absolute genius.
 
On what you, as employees, should expect...

As an employee of an Investor in People organisation, what benefits can I expect?

A priority of all organisations working with the Investors in People Standard is to ensure that their employees are kept in touch with what is going on. Importantly, as an employee of an organisation working with the Standard, you should understand your organisation's aims and objectives and the role you will play in helping it get there. It is also vital that you understand how your work contributes to the success of the organisation as a whole. It is easier for you if you know exactly what is expected of you, so you and your manager will go through what you need to achieve and how you go about it. In working with the Investors in People Standard, your organisation will have to demonstrate that it meets all of the 10 indicators of the Standard. These are outlined in the Investors in People Standard [PDF]. The way in which an organisation achieves each indicator can vary so there is no precise way of explaining exactly what practices you should be able to identify as an employee. You should realise, however, that if you are working with the Standard then you are working with an organisation that wants to do things properly. You could get ahead more quickly at work because you are managing your career better and getting the support you need to develop. It should be a good place to work, with a positive and supportive atmosphere. If you want to find out more about the benefits you can receive, please visit the following link - The Benefits of Investors in People.

source: http://www.investorsinpeople.co.uk/Standard/Pages/FAQ.aspx#17
 

Karma

War Hero
AAC, nobody who has ever undergone an IIP process would suggest that the organisation is actually IIP compliant.

The assessors are, not to put too fine a point on it, f'ing useless.

I've had the misfortune to undergo IIP accreditation five times in recent years, not once has the unit been compliant but it has passed regardless. Assessors come up with all kinds of fictions and explanations to justify their decisions.

Frankly it's bollocks.
 

FlagWagger

GCM
Book Reviewer
Karma said:
AAC, nobody who has ever undergone an IIP process would suggest that the organisation is actually IIP compliant.

The assessors are, not to put too fine a point on it, f'ing useless.

I've had the misfortune to undergo IIP accreditation five times in recent years, not once has the unit been compliant but it has passed regardless. Assessors come up with all kinds of fictions and explanations to justify their decisions.

Frankly it's bollocks.
Hear, hear - any organisation that needs a certificate and/or accreditation to demonstrate how well it apparently treats its employees is wasting its time - the expression "actions speak louder than words" springs to mind, treat your people well rather than wasting effort on flaunting meaningless stickyfoots!
 
It all goes back to the RNR thinking it has a recruitment problem (and the IIP logo on advertising will help address this) rather than a retention problem that actually doing something about communication would address.
 

itsamuppet

Lantern Swinger
So yet again confusion reigns supreme.

Can someone in Authority, preferably the highest put their name to a signal clearly stating what is the ruling this year, and also the future.

not too much to ask really considering we are expected to keep fit in our own time.
 

F169

War Hero
Its not the Navy that is b*llocks but the management who agreed the RN should be an IIP accreditted organisation. What a waste of time and money.
 

Karma

War Hero
phil1972 said:
It all goes back to the RNR thinking it has a recruitment problem (and the IIP logo on advertising will help address this) rather than a retention problem that actually doing something about communication would address.
Government mandated IIP for all public sector organisations in the mid 90s.

I'm not convinced that the RN implementation was done the best way, expecting ships to do it individually led to a huge administration burden and a lot of duplication of effort. Plus most assessors I had any dealings with were not interested in the systems they were supposed to be assessing, just peripheral indications that there had been preparation.

If anything going through the process of IIP accreditation broke a system which was already reasonably effective.
 

James_B

Badgeman
FlagWagger said:
Hear, hear - any organisation that needs a certificate and/or accreditation to demonstrate how well it apparently treats its employees is wasting its time - the expression "actions speak louder than words" springs to mind, treat your people well rather than wasting effort on flaunting meaningless stickyfoots!
It's the same as an organisation saying they are actively doing something (as opposed to just doing). Cue rants about local councils...
 

trehorn2

Lantern Swinger
Uncle_Albert said:
Indeed they can; nonetheless, ten days warning seems a bit tight. I checked in my unit once I'd got the eMail, and true to memory, there was a notice on the wall saying that anyone of my rate and age had until the end of May to take the fitness test. Not a thing about taking it this bounty year.

It's the kind of contradictory clusterfuck I've come to expect over the last six months. Ten ******* days notice for a bounty requirement. Genius, absolute genius.
Try eight hours notice mate!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MoD_RSS Government delivers 250,000 clear face masks to support people with hearing loss MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Report 05/2020: Loss of brake control on a sleeper train approaching Edinburgh MoD News 0
C Loss of HMS Sheffield Current Affairs 3
MoD_RSS AAIB Report: Boeing 737-86N, unstable approach and loss of altitude on go around MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Report 17/2019: Loss of safety critical signalling data on the Cambrian Coast line MoD News 0
MoD_RSS AAIB report: Guimbal Cabri G2 helicopter, loss of control during hover MoD News 0
MoD_RSS AAIB report: Boeing 737-4Q8, Partial loss of electrical power on approach MoD News 0
MoD_RSS AAIB report: Agusta Westland AW189, loss of visual references MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Loss of brake control on a passenger train approaching Edinburgh Waverley MoD News 0
C Hearing loss. Health & Fitness 1
MoD_RSS News story: AAIB report: Boeing 737 and Airbus A320, loss of separation MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: British Aerospace ATP, loss of electrical power MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: Update 4: AAIB investigation into the loss of aircraft N264DB MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: Update 3: AAIB investigation into the loss of aircraft N264DB MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: AAIB investigation into the loss of aircraft N264DB MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Press release: New law supports all families who suffer the loss of a child MoD News 0
J Getting deselected from promotion and loss of earning Health & Fitness 5
M Weight Loss Health & Fitness 14
MoD_RSS News story: CDE themed competition webinar: detect and treat hearing loss and tinnitus MoD News 0
muskovardo Any advice for last minute weight loss? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 18
A Great loss .Gentlemen of HMS Puma The Quarterdeck 2
J At a loss - please help... looking for Navy personal in Norfolk... Nearest & Dearest 4
trelawney126 Memory Loss Miscellaneous 0
soleil Four Weeks In May - The Loss Of HMS Coventry - David Hart Dyke - Special Offer History 1
soleil Royal Gazette: "HMS Malabar’s Last Commanding Officer Laments The Loss Of Crests" Bases / Shore Est 5
alfred_the_great Loss of Paragraphs Site Issues 10
soleil Telegraph: David Hart Dyke, The Captain Of HMS Coventry, On The Loss Of His Ship History 16
soleil Pompey News: "‘It Was An Awful Loss – But What We Did Freed Falklands’ History 0
Bad CO Loss of Formatting Buttons Site Issues 0
D Weight Loss Health & Fitness 56
ForcesJobShop Employment Opportunity: Loss Prevention Manager The Afterlife - Resettlement and Jobs 0
soleil Defense News (US): Loss Of Carrier Strike Capability Top Concern Of Royal Navy Chief Current Affairs 2
A Navy loss 1845 History 1
soleil "Development Of A Royal Navy Online Weight Loss Programme" Health & Fitness 7
T Fat Loss, Muscle Gain? Too few calories? Health & Fitness 15
BARNEYRNSM Noise induced hearing loss Submariners 77
frogman007 Sad loss of a diving legend. Current Affairs 6
soleil Herald: "Job Loss Fears For Dockyard With Axing Of Frigates" Current Affairs 0
soleil Loss of HMS Royal Oak, 13th/14th October 1939 History 3
S Help Needed - Loss of HMS Sheffield History 29
S A Loss To Motor Racing Diamond Lil's 4
B Weight loss Health & Fitness 17
C Inquiry blames Captain for Loss of HMAS Sydney History 2
finknottle I am at a loss to understand this Site Issues 9
tommo RIP Another Sad Loss Current Affairs 0
finknottle Another Tragic Loss Current Affairs 8
The_Jimmy New Weight Loss Program Health & Fitness 1
WhizzbangDai Loss of cannon pods on Harrier? The Fleet Air Arm 35
M MoD memory loss Current Affairs 8
Bergen Loss Of B-2 Tail #89-0127 Diamond Lil's 0
Similar threads


















































Top