Help for Heroes event "offensive to ethnic minorities"

Discussion in 'Current Affairs' started by Naval_Gazer, Jul 22, 2008.

Welcome to the Navy Net aka Rum Ration

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial RN website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. The matter has been corrected now and an apology has been issued but this story in today's Pompey News may still send your outrage meter off the scale (link):

     
  2. Some one voted the Pr!cks in and can Vote them out. But I expect that those who should vote will stay at home on polling day.

    Bunch of mental spastics... and before you get all PC on Me I use the term in its original context (characterized by hypertonia, or a high degree of muscle tightness.)
     
  3. "Officials apologised to Mr Chamberlain and put the refusal down to an error of judgment."

    The statements says "Officials" not Councillors! The request may never have seen a Councillor as it was for a small sum, so a Public Official would have dealt with it. But its still outrageous!!!
     
  4. This is getting really stupid and now official bodies are using it as an excuse not to fork out some smarties cash.

    What makes this stupid and an ill thought out excuse is - how many enraged Germans are there, are they complaining that it offends when we hold the annual 'Rememberance' services or having demonstrations at the numerous warmemorials?

    No of course not - this is just plain stupidity and the want of an arguable excuse.
     
  5. Minority that's the key word here, here in my country we do what is right for the majority not the minority they need to assimilate to our culture or piss off back to their country of origin. Whoever made the original decision to refuse the £500 grant should be sacked and forced to wear a hair shirt for a year.
     
  6. Last time I checked, that was how we run our country. Sorry, how they run our country... I mean... wait... who runs this country again?
     
  7. Welcome to NuLab's dream.
     
  8. Hitler was supported by the majority in the late 1930s. The sensible minority had no say. Democracy is about balancing power with responsibility. What is needed is legal (as against the impossible dream of social) equity.

    Personally I think the police & courts should be abolished as they might upset the third of the British population that has sometime committed a crime. :twisted:
     
  9. In that vein then thingy, the tax office should be abolished as it upsets everyone.
     
  10. Does anyone think to ask the ethnic minorities who have served in the forces what they think? I had a very humbling experience this weekend with young lads of various origins who had lost limbs whilst serving in Afghanistan & Iraq.
     
  11. Find out the name and address of the cvnt responsible and proceed accordingly…
     
  12. Not surprising but still very disgusting
     
  13. I hope the organisers take sufficient care with the bouncy castle and have public liability insurance or it could make a significant dent in their funds (link). I deeply sympathise with the injured boy and his family but it's a real minefield out there. I count myself extremely lucky not to have experienced something similar at my own kids' birthday parties in the back garden, complete with bouncy castle. Come to think about it, would I have to be CRB-checked these days?:

    Makes you think twice, doesn't it?
     
  14. Hitler never won a free election with a majority.

    <history teacher>In the presidential election held on March 13, 1932, there were four candidates: the incumbent, Field Marshall Paul von Hindenburg, Hitler, and two minor candidates, Ernst Thaelmann and Theodore Duesterberg. The results were:

    Hindenburg 49.6 percent
    Hitler 30.1 percent
    Thaelmann 13.2 percent
    Duesterberg 6.8 percent

    Since Hindenberg had not received a majority of the vote, however, a runoff election had to be held among the top three vote-getters. On April 19, 1932, the runoff results were:

    Hindenburg 53.0 percent
    Hitler 36.8 percent
    Thaelmann 10.2 percent

    Thus, even though Hitler’s vote total had risen, he still had been decisively rejected by the German people.

    The July 31, 1932, election produced a major victory for Hitler’s National Socialist Party. The party won 230 seats in the Reichstag, making it Germany’s largest political party, but it still fell short of a majority in the 608-member body.

    On the basis of that victory, Hitler demanded that President Hindenburg appoint him chancellor and place him in complete control of the state. Otto von Meissner, who worked for Hindenburg, later testified at Nuremberg,

    Hindenburg replied that because of the tense situation he could not in good conscience risk transferring the power of government to a new party such as the National Socialists, which did not command a majority and which was intolerant, noisy and undisciplined.

    Political deadlocks in the Reichstag soon brought a new election, this one in November 6, 1932. In that election, the Nazis lost two million votes and 34 seats. Thus, even though the National Socialist Party was still the largest political party, it had clearly lost ground among the voters.

    Attempting to remedy the chaos and the deadlocks, Hindenburg fired Papen and appointed an army general named Kurt von Schleicher as the new German chancellor. Unable to secure a majority coalition in the Reichstag, however, Schleicher finally tendered his resignation to Hindenburg, 57 days after he had been appointed.

    On January 30, 1933, President Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler chancellor of Germany. Although the National Socialists never captured more than 37 percent of the national vote, and even though they still held a minority of cabinet posts and fewer than 50 percent of the seats in the Reichstag, Hitler and the Nazis set out to to consolidate their power. With Hitler as chancellor, that proved to be a fairly easy task. </history teacher>

    Shades of recent UK elections.

    The original decision stinks though.

    James
     
  15. Like all good Scammels, it's good to see that Ruth articulates very well!
     
  16. You're right. I think that the Nazi Party took over by brute force with the support of an angry nation who thought they had had a raw deal from the Armistice. Not quite the same as snot gobbling local public servants who have ideas beyond their intellectual capacity. Although, on second thoughts, local public servants would lie down and let any PC prat take over. I need another glass of wine (Australian!)
     

Share This Page