Heathrow Airport

Discussion in 'Current Affairs' started by FAAFLYNAVY, May 29, 2013.

Welcome to the Navy Net aka Rum Ration

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial RN website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Do we need some serious thinking "outside of the box" regarding the continual problems with Heathrow? surely it would be better to build the new proposed airport in the Thames estuary & close Heathrow down.

    The land is flat, reasonably clear of buildings to be removed & vast, this would provide all the space needed for housing & industry with the transport links already in place, IE: Heathrow express, underground, M4/M25.

    The new airport could easily be Linked to the rail HS1 route & is close to the M2/M25/M20, by building the new airport it would do away with all the overflights for London & the surrounding areas, another reason is a huge number of the Heathrow flights are just passing through.

    The crushed concrete from the standings & runways alone would be worth a fortune.:neutral:
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2013

  2. Don't be feckin stupid.......................far too sensible a solution:laughing3:
     
  3. Guns

    Guns War Hero Moderator

    The problem with moving Heathrow to the East is that a vast, and it is huge, industrial base has built up along the M3 corridor to support and to utilize Heathrow. Do you pay to move that infrastructure as well or is it a case of tough?

    The Economist had a good article about this and its solution was to build West. Cheaper than the East apparently.
     
  4. I disagree entirely. My understanding is that far from stopping overflight of London all flights taking off to the west would fly over the city. Additionally, would moving the airport actually relieve any of the ATC saturation? Getting to Heathrow from the SW/W is bad enough but I have a good idea lets move the airport another hour to 2 hours away, that will make it better; particularly if going to the airport around the M25 at any time that it is busy!! I'm not an aviation expert but is it not possible to develop Bristol into a fully fledged international airport? It has the motorway close by linking Wales and the Midlands, it would (probably in my opinion) cut the veh and air traffic into Heathrow and is close enough to the M4 corridor to negate any logistical issues for companies there that an estuary airport would bring.

    IMD
     
  5. I wonder if the economists who have sought to put a cost to it all have factored in the moving of the airways and the associated navigation aids that are needed. It's not just a case of moving an airfield, infringing other controlled airspace, room for stacking etc. There many associated components that are required, not just the airport infrastructure.

    It's a bit more involved than just upping sticks and shifting because it's busy over London!
     
    • Like Like x 1

  6. Spot on Waspie. The intricacies of moving Heathrow and it's associated airspace and standing it all up elsewhere is, quite frankly, an absolute mindfuck. It's not just a case of knocking one terminal over and building another next to some nice road and rail links. The airspace above Heathrow is absolute mayhem.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2013
    • Like Like x 1
  7. AAF

    AAF Badgeman

    Last time I flew Monty was 1989, coming into Heathrow the pilot told us there would be a delay as we were stacked up, 2 in front of us and three behind, 2 more below us...clear day and you could see them all. 24 yrs on WTF is it like now.
     
  8. Judging by the array of roadworks around M3/M25 near to Gatwick yesterday, the thought did cross my mind whether sights have been switched to Gatwick ? There's so much furore around Heathrow, it could take years to wade through redtape.
    Meanwhile,work on the southbound route could be taking form quietly.
     
  9. I'll stick with military stations. Stacking 20 passenger liners at a time sounds no fun.
     
  10. I think the intention with four full length runways is all flights will land & take off from the estuary/channel end, with the continual wrangling & discontent in the home counties Tory heartland over Heathrow/Gatwick/Stanstead & KCC giving Boris island the thumbs up it looks a serious probable.

    It would be a win-win situation for KCC if they channelled all the freight only flights through Manston.

    It seems the main stumbling block is "call me Dave" can't claim it as his own idea.

    Another consideration in it's favour is we could well have a Boris TORY/Nigel UKIP coalition within a few years.:neutral:
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2013
  11. Going to have wind control machines are they?
     
  12. I stand to be corrected of course, but with the power to weight ratio & wing lift design of modern airliners wind direction is not an issue, I believe all landings & departures at Gatwick are from the same direction all the time.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2013
  13. :angel8:you will find out all about turning into wind on the Mighty RO8 Monty!!.When your F35s are at flying stations in your new home :grin:
     
  14. Nope it is single runway but that shouldn't be confused with single direction. Arrivals are made to 08 or 26, wind (and other factors) dependent.

    Good luck taking off or landing any aircraft with a 35 knot tailwind.

    Edited to add: Nearly all civilian transport aircraft have a landing / takeoff tailwind limit of 10kts.



    That's the bonus of ships Scouse, swivelly runways!
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2013
  15. Yes I see where your at, I've checked the Gatwick sight blurb & it seems they operate on a 7to3 flight landing/departure directional ratio.

    Even using this figure it would be beneficial to London & the surrounding areas if no flights were over London & just 30% departed/landed in from the west along the Thames corridor, most departures would turn well before they reached the Dartford bridge & only a few would ever need to overfly London.
     
  16. Regardless, you'd need at least 15 miles in the approach to any runway to facilitate the ILS. You can't have the stacks too far away from these points either.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. It's about 35Nm from the Dartford crossing to the intended site, with shed loads of stacking area safely over the channel.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2013
  18. Kent and Essex are going to love it.
     

Share This Page