Funny goings on in the world climate model.

LujonSA

War Hero
Certainly bizarre, we made our annual forray to the UK last month, laden with sweatshirts and jackets for a typically chilly autumn in Yorkshire only to find ourselves going around in short sleeves or T shirts all the time. At the same time other regions were having freak snow falls and hail storms. Mrs LujonSA was severly p*ssed off because carrying extra unnecessary weight meant she could not bring back to France the usual UK sourced goodies, (twelve month's supply of Yorkshire Hard-water Tea Bags etc.), she would have liked without exceeding Ryanair's mean-spirited baggage allowance.
 

pg55555

Lantern Swinger
Typical rubbish from the "antis"/"deniers"/whatevers - they, deliberately and knowingly - mix upclimate and weather.

It merely shows their ability at PR and spin rather than science. IF they want to challenge the science, then fine - but merely trying to con people with puff pieces like that just shows how dishonest or scientific illiterate they are.

Repeat after me "weather" does not equate to "climate".

.
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
pg55555 said:
Typical rubbish from the "antis"/"deniers"/whatevers - they, deliberately and knowingly - mix upclimate and weather.

It merely shows their ability at PR and spin rather than science. IF they want to challenge the science, then fine - but merely trying to con people with puff pieces like that just shows how dishonest or scientific illiterate they are.

Repeat after me "weather" does not equate to "climate".

.
And the difference is?

The world climatic model is based on historical weather data (because we have yet to develop the little time travel machine) extrapolated and corrected (using a version of the logistics equation) to form a mathematical prediction based on a little educated guesswork. If the data is poor no amount of good will or educated guesswork is worth sh!t. What this article is saying is that the robust scientific method of gathering, validating and distributing that data is............. well............crap! and has been for some time by the look of it. What were you saying about weather and climate again?

The single most important issue surrounding the global warming debate, it's cause and potential effect is not theory it's credibility and specifically the credibility of historical data. Whilst you can pick holes in the debate it is incredibly difficult to pick holes in the computer programmes or mathematics they are based on; because these are classed as corporate secrets (we are talking a great deal of money here) Whilst I think it's universally accepted that temperatures are rising the debate surrounds "by how much and at what rate...... is it a natural cycle or man made event" The accuracy of data is very important and to dismiss these recording errors shows how little respect you have for science. Here's some more GISS errors: http://wattsupwiththat.com/

If you understand the concept of non-linear dynamics; small changes in initial conditions can (and invariably do) lead to large changes in final or intemediatory reults you may consider questioning what we are being told by these "credible" organisations.

Science needs debate and doubt, without it, it ceases to be science and falls into the realms of politics...... sound familiar?
 

pg55555

Lantern Swinger
No it isn't.

It is taking a genuine (as far as the article is concerned) error and is trying to invalidate the whole of Climate Science !

Likewise the comment regarding the "Hockeystick" is incorrect - there was some concern over the original graph, but there have been numerous other analyses which have validated the basic shape (although differing in detail).

It is typical of the "antis"/"deniers"/whatevers that they know very little science and almost no climate science.

IF only they would actually demonstrate some scientific reasoning to back up their claims instead of just throwing mud then maybe there would be some sort of valid scientific debate. As it is there is no real debate going on because almost all credible climate scientists believe in Climate Change and the "antis"/"deniers"/whatevers don't even try to debate the issue, merely sitting on the sidelines throwing mud and making lots of noise.

Anytme you get near one of these "antis"/"denyers"/whatevers, just ask them why they aren't actually challenging the Climate Change supporters in scientific debate - you won't get an answer.

.
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
pg55555 said:
No it isn't.

It is taking a genuine (as far as the article is concerned) error and is trying to invalidate the whole of Climate Science !..............................


Anytme you get near one of these "antis"/"denyers"/whatevers, just ask them why they aren't actually challenging the Climate Change supporters in scientific debate - you won't get an answer.

.
You may want to read the article again then, they are doubting the validity of data, if you go to the link I added you will see that GISS has somewhat of a history of unreliable data!

If you don't think that there is a genuine scientific debate going on you aren't reading wide enough, half of the scientists who signed up to the IPPC report on climate change are not happy with it's predictions (more exactly; they believe the rate of climate change is exaggerated in the report and does not reflect the academic work they put forward to be included in it). Whilst most (but not all) agree it is occuring as a man made event many believe the report has been politically misinterpreted.

I'm probably the greenest person you'd meet, I fully support recycling (when it really is recycling, not pushing one countries problems to another for financial gain) I am appalled at the crap that is being pumped into our atmosphere (and the debate surrounding carbon is really fogging the issue of some nasty stuff we are poisoning our planet with; like Nox, cyanide and oestrogen) I could go on but my issue is that there is so much non-scientific crap preached and reported for the purpose of scare mongering and taxing that it has become almost impossible for joe public to make rational decisions about what he/she is being told.

When an article appears that discredits one of only 3 agencies globally responsible for gathering and validating world temperature records, regardless of whether it was a genuine error or not (the point is mute in science, it's an error and significant at that) you suggest it's nonsense? You bring up the subject of "genuine scientific reasoning" now think about it, what is data validation?

Edited to add: If you are genuinely interested in the science behind the hype and not just one of the many sheep who have leapt onto the political bandwagon you may want to boookmark GISS's site and view their data, they do a good job (but as has been revealed need to tighten up their validity checking.) This is an interesting chart and demonstrates just why the debate is wide open at he moment despite Al Gore's politically and financially motivated assurance that the debate is done and dusted: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.C.lrg.gif
 
B#gger. I was hoping for some real proof that it's all a load of crap. Was about to write to Broon for a car and fuel tax rebate.
Climate change is a natural phenomenon, although mankind's activities aren't helping. We may be able to slow it down, but we can't stop it.

Live with it.

Look on the bright side; if anything, English wine should improve somewhat.
 
Chieftiff, that's an interesting link, however it doesn't answer the question why is so much ice melting? There is enough documentation made over decades to prove that the ice is melting in the Alps, the Artic, in the Andes and elsewhere. Large amounts have gone. Dramatic climatic changes are almost as old as the Earth, so is this change just a part of normal circumstances or man made or a bit of both? Whatever the answer, climate change is here. A reletively minor stats c0ck up does nothing to change the situation. Lies, damn lies and statistics?
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
Crabman said:
Chieftiff, that's an interesting link, however it doesn't answer the question why is so much ice melting? There is enough documentation made over decades to prove that the ice is melting in the Alps, the Artic, in the Andes and elsewhere. Large amounts have gone. Dramatic climatic changes are almost as old as the Earth, so is this change just a part of normal circumstances or man made or a bit of both? Whatever the answer, climate change is here. A reletively minor stats c0ck up does nothing to change the situation. Lies, damn lies and statistics?
Probably because the mean Earth temperature has increased by about 0.8 degrees C since 1880 which is the basis for sea ice observation. There is good news though, October saw the fastest seasonal increase in ice growth in the history of satellite imagery: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=8285

It's also interesting to note that Arctic Sea Ice has retreated considerably further than it did in 2006-2007 (the accepted recent record) in 1947 (I think, although it may have been 1942 I will have to do some reading)

Edited: you may also want to question why a significantly large (there is nothing minor about it) data glitch for Ocober's records seems to have effected every month for the entire year on GISS's website? Perhaps data validation has no quality assurance process which has led to a sudden urge to get it right post exposure? just a thought.
 

chieftiff

War Hero
Moderator
tommo said:
Those sat images are a year out. I can't find any from this year
Unfortunately you will have to read the information below the pictures, sea ice imagery is not what you think it is (photographs) they are combinations of images taken at different wavelengths and combined to give a more accurate image, October 2008 isn't illustrated yet.

Edited....again! Here is an image though and some notes as to why: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
 

tommo

War Hero
Thanks understand about the imagery. Just nothing mentions anything about 2008 below the pictures only uptil November 2007. Hence my confusion. Unless I'm going completely mad I couldn't see any reference
 
A follow up comment to the article states that CO2 is far less of a pollutant than Methane, released into the atmosphere by the World's cows causing six times as much pollution as cars do.

So, as I suspected, climate change is all the fault of the bloody veggies. I vote we round 'em all up and put 'em in specially designed 'Abbatoir Camps', where they can be force fed on beef and tripe in order to drive down the cattle population until we have a decent summer.

:hungry:
 

come_the_day

Lantern Swinger
pg55555 said:
Anytme you get near one of these "antis"/"denyers"/whatevers, just ask them why they aren't actually challenging the Climate Change supporters in scientific debate - you won't get an answer.

.
I'm an "anti". I don't need to enter into any scientific debate, because thousands of scientists already do that on my behalf. To dismiss scientific opinion (oxymoron, surely?) because it is expressed by those who do not specialise in climate matters is ludicrous.

My problem with the Global Warming lobby is that it is a self-licking ice-cream. Too many of the would-be opinion formers rely for their salaries on unproven science, but challenge the logic of their arguments and they become indignant, which is a sure sign that they are not certain of their argument.
 

AfterSSE

War Hero
Where as on the other hand the majority of the so called "experts" that denounce Global Warming just happen to be on the payrolls of the major Oil boys...Hmmmm wonder why that is... :dwarf:

Everyone has an agenda on this issue and it's what suits them that counts, time will tell who is right and who is wrong, hopefully my descendants will have colonized some planet far far away...and this shit ball of a planet will be on display in the local museum under the title of "what not to do when trying to become enlightened".... :hockey:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ballistic Like/funny/don't like etc. facility not working. Site Issues 13
Woolfy Funny looking ear Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 27
Seadog George asks Zippy, "I'm funny how?" Diamond Lil's 1
F Finx's funny money The Gash Barge 14
scouse Some Funny ATC stories,also A700 sign ups lol The Fleet Air Arm 3
FunkyJunky Funny Facebook page The Fleet 33
Waspie Scottish iPhone - Funny The Gash Barge 0
LaurenMc hahaha I'm so drunk and you guys are funny Diamond Lil's 41
Rumrat **** off its not that funny Diamond Lil's 29
scouse Funny Dit from The Bosuns call by Hugh Willis Diamond Lil's 12
Ballistic Tour de funny Sports and Adventure Training 1
S Funny Websites The Internet - Best and Worst 4
S Funny As! Diamond Lil's 16
BreathingOutOnTheWayUp – plus ’and similar Funny Symbols Site Issues 2
The_Caretaker Really Funny Miscellaneous 0
The_Caretaker Funny one Liners Miscellaneous 0
pussercdo An old Bobitt joke - still funny Miscellaneous 0
Rumrat Thats so not fcukin funny. Diamond Lil's 24
Merlin28 Funny Tattoo Diamond Lil's 8
Rumrat This Bit Aint Funny Current Affairs 21
Rumrat Funny happening (or statements) totally shipside. Diamond Lil's 22
2_deck_dash Funny looks. Diamond Lil's 8
Z Adding the Benny Hill theme tune makes anything funny Diamond Lil's 2
2_deck_dash Now this is funny Diamond Lil's 5
moshe7158 a very funny lady Blogs 0
C Funny Aussie The Internet - Best and Worst 3
S Funny Vid The Quarterdeck 0
N Pongo`s discussing septics on arrse,quite funny Diamond Lil's 22
M I iz no racist but this is damn funny... The Gash Barge 5
Montigny_La_Palisse Think Bruno's funny? He's not a patch on Hard Gay. Hooo! Diamond Lil's 7
Z Found some funny videos for you all The Gash Barge 0
Deano19 Funny as hell sayings? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 88
T Made up funny dits. Diamond Lil's 15
O Funny Vid The Fleet Air Arm 19
Maxi_77 Funny How Things Turn Out Current Affairs 7
C funny youtube vid The Internet - Best and Worst 8
WreckerL Funny questions you've been asked Diamond Lil's 24
YouAreHavingALaugh This is so funny, but appears to be so true! Diamond Lil's 15
L Aussie interview with a Senator..... (Funny Vid) The Internet - Best and Worst 4
golden_rivet clone - funny Films, Music, TV & All Things Artsy 1
P forces gone mad - Please send us your funny stories The Quarterdeck 0
andym Random funny shit. Diamond Lil's 0
andym Funny Military pics Diamond Lil's 32
CRYSTALTIPS This is so funny Diamond Lil's 7
F Funny Viral emails Diamond Lil's 0
Teech Funny but true (honest) The Quarterdeck 1
sgtpepperband Funny Poetry Films, Music, TV & All Things Artsy 0
W The 2014 Commonwealth Games (funny) Diamond Lil's 6
sgtpepperband Funny Story Diamond Lil's 6
ET(MESM)whogivesafeck funny pics The Gash Barge 6
Similar threads


















































Top