EU Defence Force

For a long time the UK has vetoed the prospect of having a centralised EU Defence/Military force. However, having now voted to leave the EU, combined with some key figures (Macron & Merkel), it is somewhat more likely to be something we will see in the future.

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the matter?

How will this effect the RN & NATO? Do you think the UK will have a part to play?
 

Seadog

War Hero
Moderator
There is already an EU Naval Force. I don't think we currently have any surface ships attached but the boss is CGRM.

There is - if I recall correctly - no requirement to be EU to operate with EUNavFor. Navies tend to 'get on' strategically and operationally as well as socially.
 
Interesting @Seadog. So do you think if this single EU Defence Force were to become a reality, the EUNAVFOR would remain separate? Or do you think it would be sucked into the single and centrally commanded EU Force?

Am I right that Op SOPHIA is an EUNAVFOR operation? How do EUNAVFOR and NATO integrate with one another? I'd be interested to know who would take the lead, if for example, there was a need to defend the baltic region from Russian aggression etc (in a non article 5 context)? I assume NATO, given the fact that they are regularly exercising in the region and the instability that could be caused by mishandling the situation?!

Forgive me if I am talking utter nonsense. I am just trying to increase by knowledge base and understanding pre AIB.
 

Seadog

War Hero
Moderator
Forgive me if I am talking utter nonsense. I am just trying to increase by knowledge base and understanding pre AIB.
You're preparing for the AIB, you're not being interviewed for a DS slot at Staff College. Knowing the big picture and is to be encouraged - some in the Service seem to think it's for the grown ups only-but I'm not convinced the kind of detail you're after will serve you well at AIB.

IIRC, on a recent occasion the Royal Norwegian Navy put its NATO contribution under EUNavFor Command.
 
D

Deleted 59428

Guest
There is already an EU Naval Force. I don't think we currently have any surface ships attached but the boss is CGRM.

There is - if I recall correctly - no requirement to be EU to operate with EUNavFor. Navies tend to 'get on' strategically and operationally as well as socially.

There is - if I recall correctly - no requirement to be EU to operate with EUNavFor. Navies tend to 'get on' strategically and operationally as well as socially.[/QUOTE]



Mod edit @ratsroden sort the attributions out. Use the helpful quote function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Branch-Hopper

War Hero
Be aware of the big difference.

NATO ( and other co-operations) are about sovreign nations lending assets to a multi-national force. As in "Voila, M. Le Admiral Francais, vous avez HMS Floaty pour votre use." EUNAVFOR uses this basis.

What the EU want, in the long run, is specific EU forces, as in "You ain't a British Sailor now, Jack, you are a Eurosailor. And you are serving on the EU Flotable, regardless of where you where born, and that's an EU passport, not a national one."

The costs of such investment, both in equipment and personnel is huge, and will do nothing to support NATO. Its about the EU Federation having its own forces for its own use. We want no part of it.
 
There is - if I recall correctly - no requirement to be EU to operate with EUNavFor. Navies tend to 'get on' strategically and operationally as well as socially.
ABOARD HNLMS ABRAHAM CRIJNSSEN — Standing on the deck of this sleek Dutch frigate knifing through the harbour ice of Den Helder, one might see a British Admiral whistling in admiration as it glided toward the North Sea.

If the admiral came aboard the 3,400-ton warship and looked around, he might turn purple with rage or white with shock.

There he would find unionized sailors with long hair and gold earrings drinking at one of three bars on board, the engine room deserted while the frigate was underway, and only three of the 180 crew members standing watch on the bridge at night cavorting with the lady sailors.

They're part of this EU Naval Force you speak of.[/QUOTE]
Still.They gave us a good shoeing on the Medway 1667....;)

@SARKING
Mod edit:
that's not ratsroden's quote at the top but Seadog's. Ratsroden has managed to set a misquoting domino effect through the thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D

Deleted 59428

Guest
ABOARD HNLMS ABRAHAM CRIJNSSEN — Standing on the deck of this sleek Dutch frigate knifing through the harbour ice of Den Helder, one might see a British Admiral whistling in admiration as it glided toward the North Sea.

If the admiral came aboard the 3,400-ton warship and looked around, he might turn purple with rage or white with shock.

There he would find unionized sailors with long hair and gold earrings drinking at one of three bars on board, the engine room deserted while the frigate was underway, and only three of the 180 crew members standing watch on the bridge at night cavorting with the lady sailors.



They're part of this EU Naval Force you speak of.
Still.They gave us a good shoeing on the Medway 1667....;)[/QUOTE
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D

Deleted 59428

Guest
Mod notice; @ratsroden
sort out your use of the quote function. You are making a Horlicks of this already failing thread.
Sorry. Sought a solution:-
Completely agreed with the official recommendation :). I also don't see any way to prevent the process crash. What puzzles me is the current VS runner experience - the run completes successfully when there's a runaway exception. So apparently somebody is swallowing these exceptions (or mitigating their side effects) somehow. Not sure how.

Today, some tests might pass in VS (ex., BackgroundThreadShouldThrowUnhandledException_WhenBadStuffHappens) and crash under another runner. Ideally for parity, the VS runner would crash rather than swallow these exceptions.

Is there anything xUnit.net is doing in terms of AppDomains/threads that could be swallowing background exceptions, or any VS behaviour that could be change? Or perhaps the underlying VS test runner infrastructure is just doing something bad one can't change.
 

barny006

War Hero
Don't forget if it does not suit France, they will pull out as they did in 1966 under Charles De Gaulle who also kept us out of the E.E.C.
 

Branch-Hopper

War Hero
Sorry. Sought a solution:-
Completely agreed with the official recommendation :). I also don't see any way to prevent the process crash. What puzzles me is the current VS runner experience - the run completes successfully when there's a runaway exception. So apparently somebody is swallowing these exceptions (or mitigating their side effects) somehow. Not sure how.

Today, some tests might pass in VS (ex., BackgroundThreadShouldThrowUnhandledException_WhenBadStuffHappens) and crash under another runner. Ideally for parity, the VS runner would crash rather than swallow these exceptions.

Is there anything xUnit.net is doing in terms of AppDomains/threads that could be swallowing background exceptions, or any VS behaviour that could be change? Or perhaps the underlying VS test runner infrastructure is just doing something bad one can't change.
Hands up all who understood that/\ ?
No, I thought not.....
 
D

Deleted 59428

Guest
Mod notice; @ratsroden
sort out your use of the quote function. You are making a Horlicks of this already failing thread

Merely following orders.
 

Seaweed

War Hero
Book Reviewer
This is really about the EU intention, since Monnet in the 1940s, to become a Superstate with its own armed forces controlled from Brussels. Come on lads, enlist to fight for the blue and gold! I think not.
 

Seadog

War Hero
Moderator
Be aware of the big difference.

NATO ( and other co-operations) are about sovreign nations lending assets to a multi-national force. As in "Voila, M. Le Admiral Francais, vous avez HMS Floaty pour votre use." EUNAVFOR uses this basis.

What the EU want, in the long run, is specific EU forces, as in "You ain't a British Sailor now, Jack, you are a Eurosailor. And you are serving on the EU Flotable, regardless of where you where born, and that's an EU passport, not a national one."

The costs of such investment, both in equipment and personnel is huge, and will do nothing to support NATO. Its about the EU Federation having its own forces for its own use. We want no part of it.
Je ne comprends pas.

Whereas a multinational Corps / Division / Flag Staff can already operate in one language -for example - English, at unit level in an EU Army there would be no lingua franca. Creating the linguistic capability and flexibility across all ranks to create and appoint the "Euro Sailor" is a big ask.
 

Seaweed

War Hero
Book Reviewer
I 1964 JFK set up USS Biddle as the NATO mixed-manned destroyer. It was run, of course, in English. One of her RN officers was later my shipmate. He told me how he helped the Turkish officer with his language learning curve by telling him that the appropriate way to greet the CO in the morning was with 'Good Morning, Fuckface.'
 

wave_dodger

MIA
Book Reviewer
The UK having left the EU will stick with the tried and tested NATO. No point trying to ride two horses.
We won't. We will work with both as there are significant merits.

The EDA is not entirely the same as NATO but it allows us access to European procurement projects and programmes and will also help UK defence manufacturers especially SMES.

Operationally having a foot in both camps has worked for us, just Google the number of past and present EU led operations. It's especially useful when NATO can't or won't commit and national resources aren't sufficient.

We work with both at the moment, simply varying the levels of commitment as we see fit or find necessary. I can't see it altering.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
MoD_RSS Vice Chief of the Defence Staff signs future force development charter to reaffirm UK/US defence relationship MoD News 0
MoD_RSS News story: Defence Secretary welcomes deployable UK-France joint force MoD News 0
soleil "Westcountry-based Helicopter Elite Force In Jeopardy Amid Defence Budget Cuts" The Fleet Air Arm 1
perrym Defence Force Rugby League World Cup Sports and Adventure Training 2
MoD_RSS UK’s Defence Senior Advisor concludes visit to Egypt MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Dstl Scientist shortlisted for Women in Defence Awards 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Chief of Defence Intelligence comments on threats the UK will face in coming decades MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary announces investment in strategic Omani port MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Scottish defence industry wins new radar contract MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence ecologists boost rare heathland habitats MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary's speech at meeting of UK, German and French defence ministers MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Academy launches new Masters programme in Defence Innovation MoD News 0
MoD_RSS HMS Enterprise to deploy to Port of Beirut as Defence Secretary sets out package of support to Lebanon MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Burton flood defence project opens new concourse for public MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Annual £7m flood defence work finishes for 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Sir George Norton starts role as Commandant at the Royal College of Defence Studies MoD News 0
MoD_RSS York flood defence plans for Museum Gardens and Marygate MoD News 0
MoD_RSS £1.6m works start to repair Doncaster flood defence embankment MoD News 0
MoD_RSS UK defence teams up with world leading UK space company to secure next generation of military communications MoD News 0
MoD_RSS River Severn partnership secures over £40m boost for flood defence MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Minister for the Armed Forces James Heappey MP: The Ministry of Defence Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary keynote speech at the Air and Space Power Conference 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary Ben Wallace gives a speech at the Air and Space Power Conference MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Minister and Head of the US Army sign Modernisation Agreement MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Dstl forecasts future quantum landscape for UK defence and security MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Lincoln's sluice gates refurbished in flood defence revamp MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Ministry of Defence confirms the death of Fusilier Sam Brownridge MoD News 0
pompeyexpat Cummings driving defence policy? Current Affairs 4
MoD_RSS Defence pledges to evolve faster in the years ahead MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Exmouth tidal defence scheme construction pauses for summer season MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Five Eyes Defence Ministers’ Meeting MoD News 0
MoD_RSS NATO defence ministers focus on adaptation of the Alliance to counter modern threats MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary welcomes Ukraine receiving NATO Enhanced Opportunity Partner status MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Sir George Norton appointed as next Commandant of the Royal College of Defence Studies (RCDS) MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary praises UK defence industry partnership MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence Secretary addresses members of the Royal College of Defence Studies MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Ministry of Defence seeks to maximise Reserves contribution through new review MoD News 0
MoD_RSS New funding for Defence Innovation Priorities MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Readout of Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace’s phone call with US Secretary of Defense Dr. Mark T. Esper MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Joint Statement of The Northern Group of Defence Ministers, 20 May 2020 MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Ministry of Defence Police: COVID-19 response MoD News 0
MoD_RSS New pumps keep £35 million flood defence scheme on track MoD News 0
soleil Gov.UK - Defence Focus - Rank Equivalents Current Affairs 20
soleil Forces News: "How Is The Defence Animal Training Regiment Working During Lockdown?" Current Affairs 1
MoD_RSS UK Armed Forces Maintaining Critical Defence Activities MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Coronavirus precautions on the Defence Training Estate MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Defence scientists trial innovation to slash ambulance cleaning time MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Supplier chosen for new defence training agreement MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Critical flood defence work to start at historic pier in Hull MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Coronavirus: £1million Defence innovation funding MoD News 0
Similar threads


















































Top