The Government did when it chose to stop the bribes for sales to Saudi Arabia investigation which was met with, albeit unhappy, acceptance by this board so why should not this particular statute be ignored. Yes Judges are there to input some common sense when laws are questioned and as previously stated they fail miserably to do so.rosinacarley said:You cant pick and chose which statute you wish to believe in. The 1932 Act is a statute like any other.
I think you will find that the original repair bill for the chance was very small, and the rest is legal bills.
My oher point is when you move house - do a chancel search or get the appropriate indemnity. You don't but without a local search, why not a chancel search?
Please read the article. They did not buy the land, they inherited it. How would you like to inherit a debt?phil1972 said:They bought the land at a discount given the responsibility to maintain the church, the total repair bill is Â£250k they have spend Â£200k so far on legal bills. They are just gutted they didn't manage to buck the system and make a quick quid on their property speculation.
What a pity.