Navy Net - Royal Navy Community

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Commando tank regiment

The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.
 
Thats because they are main role is not on land its just to secure foot holds on beachs etc and they are a infantry role.
 

Winsk

Lantern Swinger
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.

That's an whizzo! idea.
How about their own ships, and some of their own war-planes aswell?
Stick it on some paper and post to:

Dez Browne
i/c Warry Stuff
London.
 
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
They fight anywhere not just on beaches. Tanks would be great for the corps, especially in Afghanistan.

Tanks don't do Mountains, but if they did, they would probably whoop the Taliban's arse.

I would say the reason there is no Commando Trained Tank Regiments is basically do you need to have Commando fitness if you are sat (albeit uncomfortably) in a small enclosed space for Hours at a time? On the basis that there is a high loss rate for injuries in commando training would it be worth losing troops for something they do not need?

Not saying that the Tank Regiments are pointless, far from it, but for what they do, very well, Commando training is not really needed.
 

clanky

War Hero
IIRC theres an armoured recce unit already roled to provide armoured support to royal. Ask Deeps.
 
Chicogiz said:
Thats because they are main role is not on land its just to secure foot holds on beachs etc and they are a infantry role.

Many moons ago Lympstone was called ITCRM now called CTCRM. I rest my case!!!
 

NZ_Bootneck

War Hero
The RM used to have it's own armour in WW2, heavy bunker busting mortars mounted etc, the members of these RM units didn't (As far as I'm aware) do the Commando course.
But it really wouldn't make sense to train someone up to current RM standards and then have to train them for operating tanks.
Queens Dragoon Guards do it at the mo, I believe.
Both the Engineers and the Artillery units are British Army units whose members have completed the All Arms Commando Course, at Lympstone.
NZB

Edited to add last sentence :thumright:
 

silverfox

War Hero
Moderator
Book Reviewer
The Marines are configured in the Light Role, and like the Light Role infantry units do not have organic armour. If there is need for armour then Army units are attached, as they were during Telic. The sheer impracticality of getting organic armour ashore in meaningful numbers is a problem, even though the new LCU is capable of carrying a CR2.
 

Vesper

Lantern Swinger
Winsk said:
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.

That's an whizzo! idea.
How about their own ships, and some of their own war-planes aswell?
Stick it on some paper and post to:

Dez Browne
i/c Warry Stuff
London.

This is why I never understood the USMC, they have their own helicopters, assault ships, artillery, tanks, logistics, chefs... What's the point? It's just like another US Army. Don't they already have an army? Marines, imho, should only be kept for amphibious infantry assault & a commando role- i.e. the RM. Claiming to be a marine & then sitting in armour defeats the object, join the cavalry instead.

I remain &tc,

~Vesper
 

timex

Lantern Swinger
Vesper said:
Winsk said:
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.

That's an whizzo! idea.
How about their own ships, and some of their own war-planes aswell?
Stick it on some paper and post to:

Dez Browne
i/c Warry Stuff
London.

This is why I never understood the USMC, they have their own helicopters, assault ships, artillery, tanks, logistics, chefs... What's the point? It's just like another US Army. Don't they already have an army? Marines, imho, should only be kept for amphibious infantry assault & a commando role- i.e. the RM. Claiming to be a marine & then sitting in armour defeats the object, join the cavalry instead.

I remain &tc,

~Vesper

Vesper, when you look at the size of the USMC and its role in Expeditionary warfare it doesn't need/want to rely on anyone else...

The way we do it is ideal, leave the Armour to the Cavalry, but give us back our own Attack helicopters...


Shaun
 
Vesper said:
Winsk said:
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.

That's an whizzo! idea.
How about their own ships, and some of their own war-planes aswell?
Stick it on some paper and post to:

Dez Browne
i/c Warry Stuff
London.

It would just be like haveing a other army because it would have everything the army has got just the army has no ships.
This is why I never understood the USMC, they have their own helicopters, assault ships, artillery, tanks, logistics, chefs... What's the point? It's just like another US Army. Don't they already have an army? Marines, imho, should only be kept for amphibious infantry assault & a commando role- i.e. the RM. Claiming to be a marine & then sitting in armour defeats the object, join the cavalry instead.

I remain &tc,

~Vesper
 

Karma

War Hero
Potential_Officer said:
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
They fight anywhere not just on beaches. Tanks would be great for the corps, especially in Afghanistan.

Tanks don't do Mountains, but if they did, they would probably whoop the Taliban's arse.

Like the Russians managed?

Armour is of limited value against that threat, light role meets the needs for responsiveness and mobility much more.

I would say the reason there is no Commando Trained Tank Regiments is basically do you need to have Commando fitness if you are sat (albeit uncomfortably) in a small enclosed space for Hours at a time? On the basis that there is a high loss rate for injuries in commando training would it be worth losing troops for something they do not need?

It's probably worth drawing out that the Commando role is more than just the training delivered to the individual. The style of operating, and the structure of a commando, is different from army infantry.

As already highlighted, there are elements of both armoured recce and armour which have worked with commando forces, very successfully, in the recent past, but it's not a core requirement.
 

Vesper

Lantern Swinger
timex said:
Vesper said:
Winsk said:
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.

That's an whizzo! idea.
How about their own ships, and some of their own war-planes aswell?
Stick it on some paper and post to:

Dez Browne
i/c Warry Stuff
London.

This is why I never understood the USMC, they have their own helicopters, assault ships, artillery, tanks, logistics, chefs... What's the point? It's just like another US Army. Don't they already have an army? Marines, imho, should only be kept for amphibious infantry assault & a commando role- i.e. the RM. Claiming to be a marine & then sitting in armour defeats the object, join the cavalry instead.

I remain &tc,

~Vesper

Vesper, when you look at the size of the USMC and its role in Expeditionary warfare it doesn't need/want to rely on anyone else...

The way we do it is ideal, leave the Armour to the Cavalry, but give us back our own Attack helicopters...


Shaun

I don't see why marines should be in helicopters, helicopters fly, ergo that is the airforces role is it not? The same goes for tanks etc, not wanting to rely on any other force is a rather superficial excuse, imho. If it floats it's the navy, if it flies it's the airforce, if it drives it's the army.

&tc.

~Vesper
 

Seaweed

War Hero
Book Reviewer
Yup, well that was the logic that wrecked the Fleet Air Arm in the 1930s, and cut out our AEW with disastrous results ensuing in 1982. However in the present case the idea of 3 Cdo Bde having its own permanent organic tanks conflicts with its mission whereas the Loggies and gunners are needed for that. I sense some argument by analogy here.
 

lukep

War Hero
Winsk said:
soon_to_be_bootneck said:
The RM has there own infantry-commandos, there own artillery, and there own engineers. Why dont they have a tank regiment? That way they wouldnt have to rely on the army sending them. I think 5 squadrons would do the trick.

That's an whizzo! idea.
How about their own ships, and some of their own war-planes aswell?
Stick it on some paper and post to:

Dez Browne
i/c Warry Stuff
London.

Absolutely hilarious mate!!! ''Whizzo'' Reminds me of a cnut of a rupert i once had.
 
"I don't see why marines should be in helicopters, helicopters fly, ergo that is the airforces role is it not? The same goes for tanks etc, not wanting to rely on any other force is a rather superficial excuse, imho. If it floats it's the navy, if it flies it's the airforce, if it drives it's the army.

&tc.

~Vesper " Quote.

I take it you have never had to yomp back to base because Crab air didn't fancy flying because there was a cloud in the sky?

The Navy helicopters picked us up everytime, bless them.
 
I

In_my_day

Guest
Vesper said:
I don't see why marines should be in helicopters, helicopters fly, ergo that is the airforces role is it not? The same goes for tanks etc, not wanting to rely on any other force is a rather superficial excuse, imho. If it floats it's the navy, if it flies it's the airforce, if it drives it's the army.

&tc.

~Vesper

Good post, please realise that as soon as I have finished typing I will fall to my knees and pray that you are neither a budgeteer or PJHQ staff officer!!

IMD

edited to add:

WB you beat me to it, I knew I shouldn't have answered the phone!!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Can I wear athletic tape during Royal Marine Commando training ? Joining the Royal Navy 7
E The Commando Helicopter Force Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 6
soleil FB: Green Dagger - A Film By 40 Commando Royal Marines The Corps 0
soleil Plymouth Live: "Watch Royal Marines Lead Commando Group Go Wild In The Jungle" The Corps 3
S All Arms Commando Course, Writer Branch Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 17
M Royal Navy Commando Dinner Social & Reunions 4
Z FAA COMMANDO CREWMAN HELP... Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 5
M 148 Battery Commando UPO 15
M Wearing commando flashes. The Quarterdeck 36
A 40 Commando RM / Welsh Guards ..For the record..... The Corps 16
soleil RMC Scotland: Royal Marines Commando Dinner - Glasgow - 13 June 2018 The Corps 5
B X Commando Social & Reunions 5
R commando to officer Joining the Royal Navy 3
C Commando helicopter force The Fleet Air Arm 9
Hanzzimmer Royal Navy Commando? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 6
P What happened when Superman took on the Commando Challenge Current Affairs 0
C Commando Helicopter Force The Fleet Air Arm 49
redmonkey My life with Commando Helicopter Force Diamond Lil's 11
MoD_RSS News story: Armed Forces Minister visits 40 Commando Royal Marines MoD News 0
D All arms commando course. UPO/Careers Office 105
dapperdunn The Commando who refused to die Films, Music, TV & All Things Artsy 4
R Commando helicopter force The Corps 3
R 3 Commando Brigade help The Corps 9
Blake29 Commando Helicopter Force The Fleet Air Arm 14
S Commando Training School The Corps 80
A Royal Marines Commando School The Corps 11
Seaweed 48(RM) Commando The Corps 1
matt93 Commando Reurn to the front line Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 4
dapperdunn Commando: Return to the front line Films, Music, TV & All Things Artsy 0
soleil Commando Aviation Heritage Dinner In Aid Of The FNHT - 23rd June 2014 The Fleet Air Arm 0
H some thing about Royal Navy Commando The Gash Barge 83
Ageing_Gracefully Book Competition FALKLANDS COMMANDO by Hugh McManners Competitions 17
soleil Herald: "Search For Photos Of RM Captain Who Died In Commando Display Accident" The Corps 0
J All Arms Commando Course Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 8
soleil Telegraph: "Go Commando Charity Calendar" The Corps 12
T 40 Commando trains in California The Corps 15
F Standing Task Commando Royal Marines Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 1
Ageing_Gracefully Commando: Winning WW2 Behind Enemy Lines Competitions 4
S Commando Spirit Charity Appeal The Corps 1
soleil Union J 'Go Commando' To Support Poppy Picnics Charity 9
E Commando dagger The Corps 3
T RN/Commando Aircrew Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 80
T 40 Commando Royal Marines welcome home parade details The Corps 2
Ninja_Stoker Potential Royal Marines Commando - PRMC Forum Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 0
soleil "Helmand - Diaries Of Front Line Soldiers" - 40 Commando The Corps 1
MoD_RSS News story: Commando medics ready for contingency operations MoD News 0
soleil Navy News: "Commando Medics Ready to Join RM Around The World After Gory 2 Week Ex" The Corps 0
soleil Wells Journal: "Praise For Commando Helicopter Operations" The Corps 0
eddietheboyp Seaman Specialist - commando trained? The Fleet 8
soleil Go Commando Calendar 2013 The Corps 15
Similar threads


















































Top