Navy Net - Royal Navy Community

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bad news for Brazilian Electricians

fishhead

War Hero
BBC News - Tough times ahead for London's police
Asssistant Commissioner Cressida Dick who was I/C of the operation in 2005 when Jean-Charles Menezes was shot a Stockwell Tube Station looks to have been given the job of being in overall charge of the UKs Anti-terrorist operations.A warning to all those of a swarthy complexion,don't run for the Tube as it could be your last journey.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aye,

... and now we will have every Mama-San between Rio & Brasilia sending their sons over in anticipation of the mega £Ks compensation.
 

finknottle

Banned
An innocent unarmed man was killed at point blank range and no-one was to blame......apparently.So that's alright then.

There is an exclamation mark at the end of my post and we are seeing now with the phone hacking saga; as if we did not know how the MET operate.
 

Bergen

ADC
An innocent unarmed man was killed at point blank range and no-one was to blame......apparently.So that's alright then.


The jury had the police dead to rights BUT........

Jean Charles de Menezes jury condemns police

Officers found wanting in public examination of shooting

Sean O’Neill, Crime and Security Editor



The Scotland Yard anti-terrorist operation that led to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes was subjected to withering condemnation yesterday by an inquest jury.
In one of the most important public examinations of police conduct, the jurors found the testimony of the officers who shot the young Brazilian to be unreliable and concluded that Metropolitan Police commanders failed their frontline colleagues.
Mr de Menezes, 27, an electrician, was shot seven times in the head by specialist firearms officers who mistook him for a suicide bomber about to blow up a London Tube train.
The jury rejected the Met’s contention that his killing was lawful and that he was the unfortunate victim of an unprecedented situation created by the July 2005 terrorist emergency.

Sir Michael Wright, QC, the coroner, had sparked controversy and cries of “whitewash” when he denied the jury the option of returning an unlawful killing verdict. However, the jurors, sitting in the unusual surroundings of the Oval cricket ground, yesterday delivered an open verdict and used their answers to a series of questions set by the coroner to set out their views.
They did not believe the claims of firearms officers that a warning of “armed police” had been shouted or that Mr de Menezes had advanced threateningly towards the policemen.
The jury also cited a catalogue of failures by the Met, ranging from poor communications between the control room and officers on the ground to not supplying officers with pictures of Hussain Osman, the terrorist whom they wanted. Those failings had contributed to the death of an innocent man.
The jurors also dismissed the notion that Mr de Menezes’s behaviour had seemed suspicious and somehow contributed to officers mistakenly deciding that he was a suicide bomber.

etc etc etc
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Book Reviewer
An innocent unarmed man was killed at point blank range and no-one was to blame......apparently.So that's alright then.

Not quite true. As a result of testimony during the "Stockwell 1" Enquiry into the circumstances surrounding JCDM's death, a concurrent investigation ("Stockwell 2") was conducted into the conduct of senior officers Sir Ian Blair and Andy Hayman, who were alleged to have made inaccurate statements, thus misleading the public and potentially influencing the IPCC investigation.

Following the findings of the enquiries, the CPS were unable to prosecute any individuals due to insufficient evidence. However the Met Police faced two criminal charges under the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974, for "failing to provide for the health, safety and welfare of Jean Charles de Menezes". Although the Met Police pleased not guilty, the Service was found guilty of both offences and fined £175k (with £385k legal costs).

Not a great outcome, but having studied this case for a Uni dissertation recently (and having spoken to a few of the officers involved in the incident) I am of the opinion that it was highly unlikely that it would be possible to prove which individual was responsible for the fatal shot. Cressida Dick, as Gold Commander, had insisted that officers were to detain the suspect rather than eliminate him. A few moments before the shooting, when the firearms team entered the station, Cressida Dick transferred operational control to the armed officers (in accordance with SOPs). As a result of the enquiries, although MPS were heavily criticised for their handling of the case, Cressida Dick was absolved of any "culpable responsibility".

Her recent appointment to replace Yates is appropriate and not controversial, despite what some people outside of the Police may think.
 

NZ_Bootneck

War Hero
She's probably one of the few at the Met who ain't tainted with contact with NewsCorp.
London Cops on the take whoda thunk it? Still the holiday homes on the Algarve/Cota del Sol do cost a packet eh?
 

mikh

MIA
So SPB, you are saying that the woman who said 'the police did no wrong' with regards to the de Menzies shooting has a suitable mindset to run a very important police department. This woman was also involved in the ill advised arrest of MP Damien Green, and in charge of the investigation into MPs expenses scandal, and we all saw how many convictions they let slip through their fingers on that one. Sorry very far from convinced she is the best person for the job.
 

21_Man

War Hero
I was impressed with her speech, at my Son's passing out parade, at Hendon. She's a straight talker
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Book Reviewer
I can't see what all the fuss was about.......you don't pay the fare you face the consequences.
:)

Hmm, another myth. Do some research on the case before making a pointless comment like that. JCDM used his Oyster card to travel that day. The person who witnesses said jumped the barrier was one of the U/C officers following him.
 

WreckerL

War Hero
Super Moderator
Hmm, another myth. Do some research on the case before making a pointless comment like that. JCDM used his Oyster card to travel that day. The person who witnesses said jumped the barrier was one of the U/C officers following him.

I believe FG made that post in jest Sarge, hence the smiley.
 
M

mikehunt

Guest
We have grown accustomed in this country for those in charge not accepting responsibly for disastrous events that happen under their command, so there is nothing new here.
 

Flammin Gallah

Lantern Swinger
I believe FG made that post in jest Sarge, hence the smiley.

I did but thank you for correcting me on my mistake, I will endeavour to carry out more research before making a pointless comment like that again, nobody deserved to die in such a way, RIP JCDM.
 

onions

GCM
Sgt P, it would have been, and probably still is, quite easy to prove who fired the shots, fatal or not. I'm sure the bullets were retrieved, so just subject them to ballistics testing. All weapons fired leave an individual mark on the bullets fired from it. So do the test, that will tell you which weapon fired the fatal shots and weapon issue records should tell who signed for that weapon. No two weapons leave the same
mark.

As an aside I heard a quip on the radio this morning that I think is quite apt. "The Metropolitan Police, the best that money can buy"!!
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Book Reviewer
Onions: Thanks for the forensic ballistics lesson, the theory of which I am more than familiar with... :roll:

From a legal perspective, CPS were unable to prove which round struck JCDM first, second, third, etc. Hence the inability to prove individual culpable responsibility for his death (especially as firearms officers were acting under lawful authority of a superior) and the subsequent recommendation to charge the Met Police Service as a whole for coporate negligence (see previous post).
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
higthepig Bad news The Quarterdeck 14
Stirlin Good news bad news. Diamond Lil's 45
Bondy93 Bad News! (Medically unfit for Aircrewman) Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 5
The_Caretaker Bad News Miscellaneous 0
AledJ Eyesight- bad news turned into good news! Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 33
Maxi_77 It's Not All Bad News Current Affairs 1
Gazza82 Bad News Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 30
F A bad news week The Quarterdeck 15
Shakey Bad news in the News Current Affairs 1
Stirlin Bad Religion. Current Affairs 3
O How bad is the Aircrew Pilot/Observer Qualification pipeline? Joining the Royal Navy 8
R Officer entry, bad A levels but have a foundation degree Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 21
MoD_RSS Raising expectations of children and parents, high standards for teachers and tackling bad behaviour: how schools in ‘left behind’ areas can improve MoD News 0
MoD_RSS Press release: Schools backed to tackle bad behaviour MoD News 0
S Is my eyesight too bad for the navy? Health & Fitness 3
Waspie SB-1, Bad Guys-0 The Corps 4
J Loans for bad credit UK | low credit score | FleetQuid Finance & Pensions 1
Y BBC Luvvy Bad Losers Brexit disclaimers The Gash Barge 43
WelshJaffaCake Apprenticeships: The Good,The Bad and The Ugly Current Affairs 13
Walter_white HMS RALEIGH 27th Nov Good or bad date? Joining the Royal Navy 39
RSPE With the kind permission of site admin (Bad Co) - It's a pleasure to bring you this event..... The Afterlife - Resettlement and Jobs 0
RSPE With the kind permission of site admin (Bad Co) - It's a pleasure to bring you this event..... The Gash Barge 0
RSPE With the kind permission of site admin (Bad Co) - It's a pleasure to bring you this event..... Films, Music, TV & All Things Artsy 0
RSPE With the kind permission of site admin (Bad Co) - It's a pleasure to bring you this event..... Competitions 0
stan_the_man Good days bad days Diamond Lil's 0
M How bad is the PRNC??? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 21
Waspie Bad - Bad Communists Current Affairs 5
frogman007 Bad first day at the office!! The Gash Barge 0
stan_the_man days days fcucking bad days Health & Fitness 28
B Bad day Submariners 0
witsend Romania & Bulgaria (Not that bad?) Diamond Lil's 6
Vrumm Submarines, The Good and Bad Submariners 48
SONAR-BENDER Request for Good and Bad COs Site Issues 7
Waspie I've done a bad thing. Diamond Lil's 0
F Bad taste, or just a bit of fun ? Diamond Lil's 8
SONAR-BENDER Bad luck MLP! Diamond Lil's 13
M Is it really that bad? Current Affairs 30
soleil Guardian: "HMS Albion: 'I Don't Think We Do That Bad A Job' – Video" The Fleet 0
Stirling RAF fly in bad weather ?. The Fleet Air Arm 2
A Weapons Engineering Officer- Surely it's not that bad? Joining Up - Royal Navy Recruiting 24
NZ_Bootneck You think SDSR was bad. Current Affairs 3
The_Caretaker Bad day for Gran Miscellaneous 0
The_Caretaker Good the Bad & the Ugly Miscellaneous 0
B Really bad headaches after exercise, any ideas? Health & Fitness 15
G Companies & shops. The good the bad and the pikey. The Quarterdeck 24
SONAR-BENDER E-books. Good or bad? Bloody Computers 31
soleil The Register: "Trident Delay: Cunning Plan Or Bad Idea?" Submariners 1
NotmeChief Beautiful women can be bad for your health, scientist The Quarterdeck 6
wet_blobby You think RR's bad, try Arrse. Diamond Lil's 50
C If you thought the first series of Warship was bad.... The Fleet 6
Similar threads


















































Latest Threads

New Posts

Top