Anti social family to be evicte

Only problem with this Slim is you make get these feckers next door. A pathetic rule someplace states they must have shelter. And with having ten brats they will probably be housed in a National trust cottage someplace.

Regarding ASBO on a neighbour that is fine as long as you are staying there forever. You sell your place and the solicitor finds next door has a ASBO served then there is no sale. Another genius plan brought in by our Tony I think not!!!

Personally I would send them to Motswabana land but that would be unfair on others.

What is comical is they have been at this for sixteen years. And the council think they have done so well.
 
josiecats said:
what about the children??? are they to suffer because of the parents

The children will be the "DO NOT WORRY THEY NEVER EVICT FAMILIES WITH KIDS" scenario so do as you wish and sod everybody else. Seen it so many times before.
 
They started doing this up here a good few years agoand it is having an impact. Once people realise that something will happen they take notice. Although there is no obligation to rehouse as these people are intentionally homeless the council where I used to liv does rehouse those who are evicted but under very strict terms and so far no one has been evicted twice, and the problems seem to be getting better. They have even got people evicted from homes that they own themselves, but for periods of 3 or six months.

Once people realise there is real substance to the threat of eviction they tend to sit up and take notice.
 

slim

War Hero
josiecats said:
what about the children??? are they to suffer because of the parents

Its the children who are the problem. however this problem was probably caused by a lack of parenting.
Sorry Josiecats I have more sympathy with the neighbours than withnthe children. I'm sick of all the PC types saying "what about the children".
 

josiecats

War Hero
slim said:
josiecats said:
what about the children??? are they to suffer because of the parents

Its the children who are the problem. however this problem was probably caused by a lack of parenting.
Sorry Josiecats I have more sympathy with the neighbours than withnthe children. I'm sick of all the PC types saying "what about the children".
fair enough slim....the neighbours must have gone thro hell an back..havin lived next to people like that i do understand....the kids of my neighbour wore rages while she wore only the best ,,they stole because if they did not they were beaten,,,,, after all some one had to pay for her addictions,,,
 

sgtpepperband

War Hero
Book Reviewer
What about the kids? Do people suddenly get to an age when they're off our 'Love List'? People are idiots, regardless of they're age... :shock:
 

slim

War Hero
josiecats said:
slim said:
josiecats said:
what about the children??? are they to suffer because of the parents

Its the children who are the problem. however this problem was probably caused by a lack of parenting.
Sorry Josiecats I have more sympathy with the neighbours than withnthe children. I'm sick of all the PC types saying "what about the children".
fair enough slim....the neighbours must have gone thro hell an back..havin lived next to people like that i do understand....the kids of my neighbour wore rages while she wore only the best ,,they stole because if they did not they were beaten,,,,, after all some one had to pay for her addictions,,,

Then this is a case where social services have a duty of care. i.e. the kids should be removed from the situation and put into the care of the local authority.
I have no respect for addicts, especially those who abuse their kids.
 

josiecats

War Hero
slim said:
josiecats said:
slim said:
josiecats said:
what about the children??? are they to suffer because of the parents

Its the children who are the problem. however this problem was probably caused by a lack of parenting.
Sorry Josiecats I have more sympathy with the neighbours than withnthe children. I'm sick of all the PC types saying "what about the children".
fair enough slim....the neighbours must have gone thro hell an back..havin lived next to people like that i do understand....the kids of my neighbour wore rages while she wore only the best ,,they stole because if they did not they were beaten,,,,, after all some one had to pay for her addictions,,,

Then this is a case where social services have a duty of care. i.e. the kids should be removed from the situation and put into the care of the local authority.
I have no respect for addicts, especially those who abuse their kids.

the children were removed eventualy,,,this was many years ago,,
 
josiecats said:
slim said:
josiecats said:
slim said:
josiecats said:
what about the children??? are they to suffer because of the parents

Its the children who are the problem. however this problem was probably caused by a lack of parenting.
Sorry Josiecats I have more sympathy with the neighbours than withnthe children. I'm sick of all the PC types saying "what about the children".
fair enough slim....the neighbours must have gone thro hell an back..havin lived next to people like that i do understand....the kids of my neighbour wore rages while she wore only the best ,,they stole because if they did not they were beaten,,,,, after all some one had to pay for her addictions,,,

Then this is a case where social services have a duty of care. i.e. the kids should be removed from the situation and put into the care of the local authority.
I have no respect for addicts, especially those who abuse their kids.

the children were removed eventualy,,,this was many years ago,,

The 'eventually' is the real problem, people start to think they can get away with it because all they get is the odd visit and letter. Swift action before things get out of hand works wonders in many cases, when people realise the boundaries they respond, if they find none theykeep pushing, a bit like kids and dogs really.
 
Top