Welcome to Navy Net

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial naval community.

Register now (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 49 of 49
Discuss Navy Matters in The Fleet on Navy Net; Originally Posted by Oil_Slick Originally Posted by wave_dodger . I am sure Lusty will have layered defence and they'll gauge the threat accordingly. Lusty will NOT have a 'layered defence' unless it stays very close ...
  1. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    65

    Re: Navy Matters

    Quote Originally Posted by Oil_Slick
    Quote Originally Posted by wave_dodger
    .

    I am sure Lusty will have layered defence and they'll gauge the threat accordingly.

    Lusty will NOT have a 'layered defence' unless it stays very close to the skirts of a passing USN CBG

    It's missing the fundamental and key layer of it's defence.

    It's a simple system that has stood the test of time, You defend a carrier by shooting down the oppositions bombers with your fighters before they can get within range to harm the Carrier with their weapons. We cannot do that… period.
    Or with AAW destroyers ..... how many 45's are we getting again?

  2. #42
    Senior Member Not_a_boffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pompey
    Posts
    747

    Re: Navy Matters

    Errr.... none yet and certainly not before Lusty goes up threat in the NY. In any case, O_S is bang on, the aim is to kill the smart bit of bio-mass in the front of the oppos fast jets to prevent him dropping his first load and then going back for more. Tends to discourage his mates (however suicidal - and there ain't many of them in a professional air force) from pressing their attacks as well.

    Always, always kill the archer - don't p1ss about trying to knock down his arrows. In any case, any AD ships we manage to send will probably have enough on their hands worrying about Messrs Silkworm, Saccade etc...
    "I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"

  3. #43
    Senior Member Oil_Slick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    way down south
    Posts
    2,518

    Re: Navy Matters

    Quote Originally Posted by Samson
    [
    Or with AAW destroyers ..... how many 45's are we getting again?
    6 if we're lucky and the first won't be sailing off majestically into the sunset to do battle with Johhnie Foreigner before 2010.

    And AAW destroyers should be one of the mid layer defences, they should not be the primary layer.

    The Yanks refer to the mid layer of AAW DDG's and CG's as 'missile magnets' for a very good reason, because if the CAP is breached that's exactly what they are there for… and we know what happened the last time T42's tried playing that game.
    “A bureaucrat is the most despicable of men, though he is needed as vultures are needed, but one hardly admires vultures, whom bureaucrats so strangely resemble. I have yet to meet a bureaucrat who was not petty, dull, almost witless, crafty or stupid, an oppressor or a thief, a holder of little authority in which he delights, as a boy delights in possessing a vicious dog. Who can trust such creatures?”

    Marcus Tullius Cicero

  4. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    65

    Re: Navy Matters

    point taken, there is no substitute for having the right kit.

  5. #45
    Senior Member Passed-over_Loggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Hills of Bath
    Posts
    4,267

    Re: Navy Matters

    Not_a_boffin. The other dvantage of a manned fighter is that it allows a measured flexible response; very much what the RAF Fighter Group does with QRA. It allows armed diplomacy and extends the flash to bang interval: something not easily done with just an active MEZ.

  6. #46
    Senior Member Not_a_boffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pompey
    Posts
    747

    Re: Navy Matters

    Absolutely. Allows ID of NCTs as well, plenty of options before you have to splash them. Bet the skipper of Vincennes wished he'd had a CAP under control to check that airbus......
    "I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    2,511
    Images
    3

    Re: Navy Matters

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_a_boffin
    Absolutely. Allows ID of NCTs as well, plenty of options before you have to splash them. Bet the skipper of Vincennes wished he'd had a CAP under control to check that airbus......
    Totally agree - whilst on Armilla patrol we had three air contacts approaching us. Years before hand I had seen F14 radars but as having no proof from on site data sources I kept schtum (usual Golly routine) but the third target wasn't transmitting. As Iran had Tomcats in its OOB I started to sh1t myself - and so did the PWO. Turned out to be two F14 from USS BloodyBigThing that had turned up unannounced outside of the Gulf "escorting" an Iranian P3C - which we had seen on numerous occasions - but that is another dit.

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Cornwalll
    Posts
    573

    Re: Navy Matters

    yes danny it was on the tireless under the ice ,the submariners will tell you more i dont know the technical things about it ,but may they RIP

  9. #49
    Senior Member janner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    6,449
    Images
    12

    Re: Navy Matters

    janner



Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •