Welcome to Navy Net

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial naval community.

Register now (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree2Likes
Discuss RUSI: "Choosing Plan B: Reviewing The UK's Choice Of Joint Strike Fighter" in The Fleet Air Arm on Navy Net; RUSI - Choosing Plan B: Reviewing the UK's Choice of Joint Strike Fighter...
  1. #1
    Moderator soleil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,985
    Images
    1

    RUSI: "Choosing Plan B: Reviewing The UK's Choice Of Joint Strike Fighter"


  2. #2
    Senior Member EarlyChop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    758
    Well at least the "B" is a little more showy!
    RT for AET in April 2010.

    Everything done.

    Early summer 2012, hopefully.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Not_a_boffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pompey
    Posts
    747
    More nonsense.

    The EMALS system is already being integrated into USS Ford, we are buying the second set of hardware. The arrester gear is not problematic, what is problematic is the hook on the C variant, for which fixes are being investigated.

    Finally, the part regarding tankers is also mostly hoop. If to achieve it's bring-back weight, the B-variant has to do the rolling vertical , then it will be just as vulnerable to a foul deck, which is less to do with the arrester wires and more to do with the safe landing area. In any case, with a combat radius of 380nm compared to 700-odd, your B pilot is going to be struggling with fuel anyway!
    "I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Roanoke, Virginia
    Posts
    82
    F-18E/F...

  5. #5
    Senior Member scouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,632
    The good old days when we could cross/ops on the cat and traps and wooden flight decks of the Septics LOL

  6. #6
    Senior Member off_les_aura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Neither here nor there
    Posts
    852
    Quote Originally Posted by scouse View Post
    The good old days when we could cross/ops on the cat and traps and wooden flight decks of the Septics LOL
    You mean, the good-old days when we could design and build world-class leading carriers and carrier strike aircraft
    Almost there...

  7. #7
    Senior Member Not_a_boffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pompey
    Posts
    747
    To be fair, there is actually very little wrong with the current ship design. The problem is a fight to the death between vested interests in MB. The aircraft question is important, but essentialy it's a choice between one option with no plan B if it goes t1ts and another option where there are alternate or interim solutions.
    "I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"

  8. #8
    Senior Member scouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,632
    No disrespect to you and your theory on aircraft carriers NB , but I am getting a tad bit bored, by the constant spin, from the grown ups. Re cats and traps ! VSTOL, etc and what life will be like in the Future FAA. It's not going to happen is it??? end of !!!

  9. #9
    Moderator soleil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,985
    Images
    1

  10. #10
    Senior Member Not_a_boffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pompey
    Posts
    747
    Scouse

    If you build them, the aircraft will (eventually) come. Despite the negative press, QE is taking shape (well) in Rosyth. PoW is also beginning to become a physical reality.

    Maintenance of the aim is the order of the day. The negative spin is a tactic of those whose goal is to see the f/w capability die and never return.
    "I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •