Welcome to Navy Net

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial naval community.

Register now (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Like Tree1Likes
Discuss Telegraph: "Inland Somali Pirate Bases To Be Targeted" in Current Affairs on Navy Net; Inland Somali pirate bases to be targeted - Telegraph...
  1. #1
    Moderator soleil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,977
    Images
    1

    Telegraph: "Inland Somali Pirate Bases To Be Targeted"


  2. #2
    Senior Member fishhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Far Corfe
    Posts
    1,305
    If the Pirates weren't so busy counting their ransom money they might register a little concern over this latest plan.
    Rules are the wise man's guide and the fool's Bible

  3. #3
    Senior Member Seaweed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Near Pompey
    Posts
    2,978
    Images
    4
    Piracy Threat Escalating for the Global Shipping Industry

    Scroll down for some ransom figures.
    Edmund Burke: 'Wars may be deferred .. but they cannot be wholly avoided .. to purchase present quiet, at the price of future security, is .. a cowardice of the most base and degrading nature."

    Nelson: "You should hate a Frenchman as you do the devil".

  4. #4
    Senior Member trelawney126's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    3,728
    Images
    35
    But the use of ground troops or missiles strike launched from naval vessels will not be permitted after Germany and Spain expressed reservations over the expanded rules of engagement.
    Don't think they'll be that bothered given the above. Personally I'd send them a signed framed colour photograph of Baroness Ashton...That threat should be enough for them to cease piracy when they see what she looks like
    Last edited by trelawney126; 23-03-12 at 18:56.
    finknottle likes this.
    Illius me paenitet dux

  5. #5
    Senior Member WreckerL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Guzz
    Posts
    11,310
    If we can't use missiles I suppose we'll have to rely on our carriers if the pirates would be so good as to hang on 10 years or so.
    Sh1t shot, pumping slop.

  6. #6
    Senior Member broadside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    GMT +3
    Posts
    1,571
    Not being able to use ground troops or missiles strike from naval vessels is a nuisance but probably pragmatically sensible since the former would put us right into body bag territory and the latter has significant "collateral damage" implications. There are still a lot of spanners in the toolbox though, even without these options - and the decision can always be extended in light of experience going forward.

    This is a very positive step and should help to shift the whole thing up a gear or two.
    ... of course I could be wrong; I was once ... when I said I could be wrong!

  7. #7
    Moderator wet_blobby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere near a wet patch
    Posts
    7,654
    Bootnecks have already been ashore in Somalia.

    The option should be left on the table.
    why you kikka my dog and a call it fuck off?

  8. #8
    Senior Member MG Maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    50.463458N, -1.401207W
    Posts
    1,724
    Quote Originally Posted by trelawney126 View Post
    But the use of ground troops or missiles strike launched from naval vessels will not be permitted after Germany and Spain expressed reservations over the expanded rules of engagement.
    Doesn't leave a lot then does it ... land based strike aircraft carrying humongous amounts of 1000lb bombs ... yep that'll do it!
    Smother me in chocolate and throw me to the lesbians!

  9. #9
    Senior Member broadside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    GMT +3
    Posts
    1,571
    Quote Originally Posted by MG Maniac View Post
    Doesn't leave a lot then does it ... land based strike aircraft carrying humongous amounts of 1000lb bombs ... yep that'll do it!
    I rather suspect that you are interpreting the limits too widely. Missiles launched from naval vessels will not be allowed. Strike from organic air assets probably will - the difference will be whether the platform delivering the ordnance has "eyes on" target and short flash to bang window.

    Just a guess but that is how I would interpret the ROE limit
    ... of course I could be wrong; I was once ... when I said I could be wrong!

  10. #10
    Senior Member MG Maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    50.463458N, -1.401207W
    Posts
    1,724
    Quote Originally Posted by broadside View Post
    I rather suspect that you are interpreting the limits too widely.
    Sorry Broadside ... my interpretation was definitely tongue-in-cheek - although it could be a fiendish plot by the RAF to give them something else to justify their existance! Although to be honest if the use of Ground Troops is out along with ship based missle stikes ... it doesn't leave a great deal to the imagination - but there again I'm only a humble doc and not versed in all the whoosh whizbangs that you lot play with!
    Smother me in chocolate and throw me to the lesbians!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •