Back to top
Skip to menu
Skip to content
I've not heard of this - not surprising really, CHF are Navy when it suits 'em and Army when it don't! Seeing the recent fait accompli concerning 24 Regiment sprung by the Army, nothing surprises me any more.
If the RN Merlin has a different designation to the non-maritime variant, then given the bureacracy associated with Military Aircraft Release it would probably be easier to procure from an alternative source. Just look at all the trouble they had in deleting the gun on Typhoon - to remove the gun would affect the aircraft balance and would require full flight testing again; solution retain the gun just disable it (until batch 2 at least).
_________________
It came off in my hand Chief, honest.
3 dits, 4 dits, 2 dits, dah, dit dit dah dit, dit dit dah.
I'm sure someone somewhere is taking a long hard look at the current MAR and seeing whether its been written in such a way as to permit this tasking. While I can see the need to put restrictions on the operating envelope and permissible configurations of an aircraft, at times it seems as if the MAR is far too specific and proscriptive (but at least it keeps a large proportion of QinetiQ in business!).
_________________
It came off in my hand Chief, honest.
3 dits, 4 dits, 2 dits, dah, dit dit dah dit, dit dit dah.
It's been done before - '82 and, more recently, for 845/846
They may go up diddly up but they're still gits.
A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:38 pm
Rumour going round on PPrune that CHF is going to stand up a Merlin squadron using airframes bumped from the Danish/Portuguese orders. Manned mainly by Culdrose crews but with a Jungly LH seat.
www.pprune.org/forums/...p?t=246393
Great to have a bit of relief for the SK4 crews, but is it permanent or is it the temporary PFI mooted some weeks ago?
Anybody shed any light?
_________________
"I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"
www.pprune.org/forums/...p?t=246393
Great to have a bit of relief for the SK4 crews, but is it permanent or is it the temporary PFI mooted some weeks ago?
Anybody shed any light?
_________________
"I'll get some more guns sarge." " Yeah, and make 'em big!"

Not_a_boffin
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Feb 10, 2006
- Location: Pompey
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:45 pm
bet the pinger jockeys are cacking themselves, from dawdling around helston to helmatt

chockhead819
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Apr 20, 2006
- Location: carlisle
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:15 pm
Not_a_boffin:
Rumour going round on PPrune that CHF is going to stand up a Merlin squadron using airframes bumped from the Danish/Portuguese orders. Manned mainly by Culdrose crews but with a Jungly LH seat.
www.pprune.org/forums/...p?t=246393
Great to have a bit of relief for the SK4 crews, but is it permanent or is it the temporary PFI mooted some weeks ago?
Anybody shed any light?
www.pprune.org/forums/...p?t=246393
Great to have a bit of relief for the SK4 crews, but is it permanent or is it the temporary PFI mooted some weeks ago?
Anybody shed any light?
I've not heard of this - not surprising really, CHF are Navy when it suits 'em and Army when it don't! Seeing the recent fait accompli concerning 24 Regiment sprung by the Army, nothing surprises me any more.

fido
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mar 08, 2006
- Location: West Country
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:27 pm
i have heard from a colleague that the MOD is that desperate, westlands at the moment is overhauling v old pumas from the south african air force. How desperate has Blair made us??

Bisley
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Apr 12, 2006
- Location: good point well phrased
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:06 pm
I also heard yesterday over scran that the MOD is trying to acquire Danish eh101s to sort out the lack of heavy lift.
Also that the lions share of the crews will be from the far south west!
Seems this rumour has substance?
_________________
Damn the torpedoes - Full speed ahead
"Ne conjugare nobiscum"
Also that the lions share of the crews will be from the far south west!
Seems this rumour has substance?
_________________
Damn the torpedoes - Full speed ahead
"Ne conjugare nobiscum"

Point_West
- Posts: 22
- Joined: May 12, 2006
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:10 pm
From what I know of them, Cornwall's own airforce will be jumping at the chance!

stumpy
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 12, 2006
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:20 pm
And rather than getting hold of Dutch or other foreign ones, why not remove the sonar equipment from the RN ones. I know it is not perfect, ie: no big ramp at the back, but it can be done very quickly. Repaint them, fit a GPMG, and off they go...
_________________
Isaiah 54:16 "And it is I who have created the destroyer to work havoc..." See, naval procurement is God's will!
_________________
Isaiah 54:16 "And it is I who have created the destroyer to work havoc..." See, naval procurement is God's will!

stumpy
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 12, 2006
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:17 pm
stumpy:
And rather than getting hold of Dutch or other foreign ones, why not remove the sonar equipment from the RN ones. I know it is not perfect, ie: no big ramp at the back, but it can be done very quickly. Repaint them, fit a GPMG, and off they go...
If the RN Merlin has a different designation to the non-maritime variant, then given the bureacracy associated with Military Aircraft Release it would probably be easier to procure from an alternative source. Just look at all the trouble they had in deleting the gun on Typhoon - to remove the gun would affect the aircraft balance and would require full flight testing again; solution retain the gun just disable it (until batch 2 at least).
_________________
It came off in my hand Chief, honest.
3 dits, 4 dits, 2 dits, dah, dit dit dah dit, dit dit dah.

FlagWagger
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Apr 16, 2006
- Location: Lost
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:56 am
Good point, but the RN Merlin is designed to be able to remove the sonar equipment in a couple of hours (or so), so that it can easily be used to carry stores to ship etc. The RN have about 40 Merlins, twice as many as the RAF...
It might seem a shame to use a lovely ASW aircraft in this way, but it seems we are desperate...
It might seem a shame to use a lovely ASW aircraft in this way, but it seems we are desperate...

stumpy
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 12, 2006
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
stumpy:
Good point, but the RN Merlin is designed to be able to remove the sonar equipment in a couple of hours (or so), so that it can easily be used to carry stores to ship etc. The RN have about 40 Merlins, twice as many as the RAF...
It might seem a shame to use a lovely ASW aircraft in this way, but it seems we are desperate...
It might seem a shame to use a lovely ASW aircraft in this way, but it seems we are desperate...
I'm sure someone somewhere is taking a long hard look at the current MAR and seeing whether its been written in such a way as to permit this tasking. While I can see the need to put restrictions on the operating envelope and permissible configurations of an aircraft, at times it seems as if the MAR is far too specific and proscriptive (but at least it keeps a large proportion of QinetiQ in business!).
_________________
It came off in my hand Chief, honest.
3 dits, 4 dits, 2 dits, dah, dit dit dah dit, dit dit dah.

FlagWagger
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Apr 16, 2006
- Location: Lost
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:22 pm
All good points, but something else to consider is the training burden. Even with a Junglie as LHS, the RHs will still need some sort of conversion.
When I was down there this summer, they seemed more concerned with that than the A/c conversion... but then they were aircrew and not engineers who would have to do it.
When I was down there this summer, they seemed more concerned with that than the A/c conversion... but then they were aircrew and not engineers who would have to do it.

i/cflyingcircus
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:52 pm
Looks like the return of the 'Pinglies' is upon us.
Lets hope they fair better than in '82 when they kept accidently crossing the FLOT at altitude (allegedly)!
_________________
"He speaks the truth they dare not say out loud"
Lets hope they fair better than in '82 when they kept accidently crossing the FLOT at altitude (allegedly)!
_________________
"He speaks the truth they dare not say out loud"

avoiding_action
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mar 19, 2006
- Location: Fighter town (well it was once)
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:08 pm
stumpy:
And rather than getting hold of Dutch or other foreign ones, why not remove the sonar equipment from the RN ones. I know it is not perfect, ie: no big ramp at the back, but it can be done very quickly. Repaint them, fit a GPMG, and off they go...
It's been done before - '82 and, more recently, for 845/846

fido
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mar 08, 2006
- Location: West Country
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:52 pm
The interesting thing is that if it did happen soon, (ie this winter) you would have Britain fighting an intense war in a landlocked, mountanous country, using the RM as infantry, the FAA as helicopter lift and the FAA for CAS with Harriers...
_________________
Isaiah 54:16 "And it is I who have created the destroyer to work havoc..." See, naval procurement is God's will!
_________________
Isaiah 54:16 "And it is I who have created the destroyer to work havoc..." See, naval procurement is God's will!

stumpy
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 12, 2006
Re: A bit of help for the Junglies?
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:56 pm
While at the same time conducting a large amphibious exercise off West Africa...BZ!
_________________
Isaiah 54:16 "And it is I who have created the destroyer to work havoc..." See, naval procurement is God's will!
_________________
Isaiah 54:16 "And it is I who have created the destroyer to work havoc..." See, naval procurement is God's will!

stumpy
- Posts: 759
- Joined: May 12, 2006
All times are GMT

